Design from the everyday: continuously evolving, embedded exploratory prototypes

One of the major challenges in the design of social technologies is the evaluation of their qualities of use and how they are appropriated over time. While the field of HCI abounds in short-term exploratory design and studies of use, relatively little attention has focused on the continuous development of prototypes longitudinally and studies of their emergent use. We ground the exploration and analysis of use in the everyday world, embracing contingency and open-ended use, through the use of a continuously-available exploratory prototype. Through examining use longitudinally, clearer insight can be gained of realistic, non-novelty usage and appropriation into everyday use. This paper sketches out a framework for design that puts a premium on immediate use and evolving the design in response to use and user feedback. While such design practices with continuously developing systems are common in the design of social technologies, they are little documented. We describe our approach and reflect upon its key characteristics, based on our experiences from two case studies. We also present five major patterns of long-term usage which we found useful for design.

[1]  Kae Ishii,et al.  Mizuko Ito, Daisuke Okabe and Misa Matsuda (eds.), Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life , 2009 .

[2]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities , 1996, CHI.

[3]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS (The Computer Supported Cooperative Work Series) , 2005 .

[4]  Jennie Carroll,et al.  Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle , 2004, ECIS.

[5]  Andy Crabtree,et al.  Taking technomethodology seriously: hybrid change in the ethnomethodology–design relationship , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Tom Rodden,et al.  The Designers' Notepad: Supporting and Understanding Cooperative Design , 1993, ECSCW.

[7]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Iterative user-interface design , 1993, Computer.

[8]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Exploring Awareness Related Messaging Through Two Situated-Display-Based Systems , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  H. Mackay,et al.  Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation , 1992 .

[10]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Resilience in the face of innovation: Household trials with BubbleBoard , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Chapter 25 Use, design and evaluation: Steps towards an integration , 1996 .

[12]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  Predrag V. Klasnja,et al.  Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design , 2008, DIS '08.

[14]  Margot Brereton Designing from somewhere : a located, relational and transformative view of design , 2009 .

[15]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints , 2009, C&C '09.

[16]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[17]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Designing Interaction for Local Communications: An Urban Screen Study , 2009, INTERACT.

[18]  Karl Aspelund,et al.  The Design Process , 2006 .

[19]  Steve Benford,et al.  Supporting ethnographic studies of ubiquitous computing in the wild , 2006, DIS '06.

[20]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[21]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[22]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[23]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  HCI, natural science and design: a framework for triangulation across disciplines , 1997, DIS '97.

[24]  Jacob Buur,et al.  The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design , 2002, TCHI.

[25]  Lowell Jay Arthur,et al.  Rapid evolutionary development - requirements, prototyping and software creation , 1992, Wiley series in software engineering practice.

[26]  Danny Miller Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. , 2006 .

[27]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Unfolding understandings: co-designing UbiComp In Situ, over time , 2006, DIS '06.

[28]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  HomeNote: supporting situated messaging in the home , 2006, CSCW '06.

[29]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[30]  C. T. Hansen,et al.  The Design Process , 2015 .

[31]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  Ian Smith,et al.  Innovation in extremis: evolving an application for the critical work of email and information management , 2002, DIS '02.

[34]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Cross-channel mobile social software: an empirical study , 2008, CHI.

[35]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Making things work: dimensions of configurability as appropriation work , 2006, CSCW '06.

[36]  Clint Heyer MOBILE SOCIAL SOFTWARE : The design, implementation and usage of a system for mobile group communication, coordination and sharing. , 2008 .

[37]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Situated evaluation for cooperative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[38]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Discovery and Integration of Mobile Communications in Everyday Life , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[39]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .