Comparison of two concentrated winding topologies applied on an axial flux permanent magnet machine

Axial flux machines with internal stator and two outer rotor discs are either specified as N-S- or N-N-type, dependant on the flux path through the stator. While the N-S- type has to be equipped with tooth-wound coils, the N-N- type allows the application of core-wound coils. The main difference between these winding configurations is the alignment of the end turns. Since the stator of a N-N-machine requires additional space for a yoke, this drawback can be potentially balanced out by using core-wound coils. This paper gives an analytical approach in order to evaluate both stator types including the respective winding configurations. It is shown that tooth- and core-wound coils are subject to the same winding factor if the same number of slots per pole and phase (SPP) is chosen. Apart from that, a comparison of the stator losses under the supposition of identical stator volumes is drawn. The result reveals that the N-N- machine is likely to produce more iron and copper losses, if the SPP is near to 1/3, as it is compulsory for tooth-wound coils. Eventually, it is reasoned that the N-N-machine gets more competitive if core-wound coils with a SPP of about 1/6 are applied.

[1]  M. D. McCulloch,et al.  Axial flux permanent magnet machines: A new topology for high performance applications , 2006 .

[2]  F. Sahin Design and development of a high-speed axial-flux permanent-magnet machine , 2001 .

[3]  A.J.A. Vandenput,et al.  Design, development and testing of a high-speed axial-flux permanent-magnet machine , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[4]  F. Caricchi,et al.  Fractional-Slot Concentrated-Winding Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Machine With Core-Wound Coils , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Mechanical construction and analysis of an axial flux segmented armature torus machine , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM).

[6]  T.A. Lipo,et al.  TORUS concept machines: pre-prototyping design assessment for two major topologies , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[7]  R. Nilssen,et al.  Performance Comparisons Among Radial-Flux, Multistage Axial-Flux, and Three-Phase Transverse-Flux PM Machines for Downhole Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  F. Profumo,et al.  A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for PM synchronous motors , 2001, Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. 36th IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.01CH37248).

[9]  T. Lipo,et al.  AXIAL FLUX PERMANENT MAGNET DISC MACHINES: A REVIEW , 2004 .