Can Urban Growth Management Work in an Era of Political and Economic Change?

Problem: Urban growth management policy employs a range of tools to restrain urban sprawl, promote efficient land use, and preserve open space. Yet the efficacy of such policy is widely debated and challenged, necessitating reliable empirical evidence from case studies assessing the historical success (or failure) of such policy. Purpose: We review Israeli national growth management policy over a 36-year period, recording long-term land development trends in order to assess the efficacy of policy. Methods: We integrate a historical analysis of qualitative policy data and quantitative performance indicators of urban spatial development for a selected region of the country. We use a suite of spatial variables indicating amount, distribution, and configuration of built space along with other sprawl-relevant statistical data. Results and conclusions: In the 1970s and 1980s, open space was preserved largely due to agricultural preservation policy, despite demographic and economic growth. During the 1990s, the initiation of growth management policy coincided with a profound proliferation of development and population movement to low-density suburbs. While statistical indicators from the past several years are equivocal, they suggest that policy is encouraging higher-density development and slowing the loss of open space. Takeaway for practice: Urban growth management policy and its impact must be considered within the historical context in which it was implemented. Changes in land use policy in Israel reflect socioeconomic and political changes; when policy did not adapt to changes in society, the results were undesirable. Today, planning tools (e.g., minimum density limits, population size thresholds, urban growth boundaries, and land use fabrics) strike a balance between top-down planning objectives and bottom-up development pressures. The use of these tools within a statutory, national-level plan helps ensure consistency of implementation across regions.

[1]  Chris Couch,et al.  Controlling urban sprawl: Some experiences from Liverpool , 2006 .

[2]  Rachelle Alterman,et al.  Planning in the Face of Crisis: Land Use, Housing, and Mass Immigration in Israel , 2005 .

[3]  E. Feitelson.  Social norms, rationales and policies: reframing farmland protection in Israel , 1999 .

[4]  Ravit Hananel.  Zionism and agricultural land: National narratives, environmental objectives, and land policy in Israel , 2010 .

[5]  Daniel E. Orenstein,et al.  Population and pavement: population growth and land development in Israel , 2010 .

[6]  G. Knaap,et al.  Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl? , 2004 .

[7]  A. Frenkel.  The potential effect of national growth-management policy on urban sprawl and the depletion of open spaces and farmland , 2004 .

[8]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[9]  Other.  Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge , 2006 .

[10]  Rassem Khamaisi.  ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES AND SPATIAL CONTROL: THE CASE OF THE ARAB LOCALITIES DEVELOPMENT IN ISRAEL , 2006 .

[11]  D. Newman,et al.  Institutions and settlers as reluctant partners: Changing power relations and the development of new settlement patterns in Israel , 1989 .

[12]  A. Nelson.  Comparing states with and without growth management Analysis based on indicators with policy implications , 1999 .

[13]  Beverly K Wilson,et al.  Do Large Residential Subdivisions Induce Further Development? , 2010 .

[14]  Yehezkel Dror,et al.  Policymaking under adversity , 1986 .

[15]  A. Kellerman.  Society and Settlement: Jewish Land of Israel in the Twentieth Century , 1993 .

[16]  Efraim Ben-Zadok,et al.  Consistency, Concurrency and Compact Development: Three Faces of Growth Management Implementation in Florida , 2005 .

[17]  Lucius Annaeus Seneca,et al.  Ad Lucilium epistulae morales , 2011 .

[18]  D. Bengston,et al.  Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States , 2004 .

[19]  Shih-Kung Lai,et al.  Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: an assessment , 2009 .

[20]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[21]  J. Newell,et al.  Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation , 2005 .

[22]  G. Squires,et al.  Privileged Places: Race, Uneven Development and the Geography of Opportunity in Urban America , 2005 .

[23]  Jerry Weitz,et al.  From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999 , 1999 .

[24]  Evelien van Rij,et al.  Analysing the success of open space preservation in the Netherlands: the Midden-Delfland case , 2008 .

[25]  Larissa Larsen,et al.  Preserving natural features: A GIS-based evaluation of a local open-space ordinance , 2007 .

[26]  R. Ewing.  Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[27]  Hugh Millward,et al.  Urban containment strategies: A case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities , 2006 .

[28]  Terry Moore,et al.  Development inside Urban Growth Boundaries: Oregon's Empirical Evidence of Contiguous Urban Form , 1998 .

[29]  Arza Churchman,et al.  Disentangling the Concept of Density , 1999 .

[30]  Rassem Khamaisi.  Land ownership as a determinant in the formation of residential areas in Arab localities , 1995 .

[31]  Anthony Downs,et al.  The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited , 1998 .

[32]  R. Ewing,et al.  MEASURING SPRAWL AND ITS IMPACT , 2002 .

[33]  Rachelle Alterman,et al.  The Challenge of Farmland Preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation Comparison , 1997 .

[34]  John F. Mustard,et al.  How much is built? Quantifying and interpreting patterns of built space from different data sources , 2011 .

[35]  Arie Shachar,et al.  Reshaping the Map of Israel: A New National Planning Doctrine , 1998 .

[36]  E. Koomen,et al.  Open-space preservation in the Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects , 2008 .

[37]  Tobago.  Population and Housing Census. , 2011 .

[38]  T. Moore.  Why Allow Planners to Do What They Do? A Justification from Economic Theory , 1978 .

[39]  Lihui Tian,et al.  Analyzing Growth-Management Policies with Geographical Information Systems , 1998 .

[40]  G. Galster,et al.  There is No Sprawl Syndrome: A New Typology of Metropolitan Land Use Patterns , 2006 .

[41]  Amnon Frenkel,et al.  A Land-Consumption Model: Its Application to Israel's Future Spatial Development , 2004 .

[42]  A. Tal.  Space Matters: Historic Drivers and Turning Points In Israel’s Open Space Protection Policy , 2008 .

[43]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Assessing urban growth management ?: The case of Portland, Oregon, the USA's largest urban growth boundary , 1993 .