Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?
暂无分享,去创建一个
In 1972 Labov described the basic sociolinguistic question as the one ‘posed by the need to understand why anyone says anything’ (1972:207). Clearly the aim is very different from that of specifying the form of a grammar that generates all and only the well-formed sentences of a language. The goal is a theory of utterances. Moreover, the ‘why’ question can also be read as ‘what for’. What does anyone say anything for? I think we can safely say that this question places sociolinguistic analysis in a functional framework. If sociolinguistics looks for answers to the ‘why’ of saying something, it is seeking functional explanations.
[1] P. Thibault,et al. L'alternance entre les auxiliaires avoir et être en français parlé à Montréal , 1977 .
[2] D. Bolinger. Meaning and form , 1979 .
[3] M. Silverstein. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description , 1976 .
[4] William Labov,et al. Empirical Foundations of Linguistic Theory , 1975 .
[5] Penelope Brown,et al. The origins of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives [reprint of 1976 article in Language] , 1976 .