A case study for assured containment

While incremental steps are being taken to integrate unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the various national airspace systems, much work remains to establish appropriate regulatory infrastructure that allows UAS larger than 55 lb to operate for commerce or hire. The magnitude of that effort is compounded by the wide-ranging variety of UAS types and possible applications, as well as the diversity in quality and provenance of UAS components. The FAA has suggested developing design standards tailored to specific applications and operating environments as an approach to facilitate integration and safe operation of some UAS. This paper introduces a case study to investigate design standards for a midsize unmanned rotorcraft operating in a rural environment. A key aspect of this study is the concept of using a certifiable containment system, different from a conventional geofencing application, to ensure that the unmanned aircraft does not escape its intended operational area. The proposed assured containment system is expected to reduce the effort needed to regulate some UAS that could not currently meet rigorous aircraft design standards and fall outside of the parameters for operation outlined in the proposed small UAS rule. This paper discusses how assured containment may be a useful approach to limiting risk and reducing an otherwise prohibitive certification burden to enable UAS operations in confined areas. The case study examines the potential effect the assured containment approach might have on airworthiness certification requirements.

[1]  Jeremiah Gertler.  U.S. Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2012 .

[2]  Bruce T. Clough.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Autonomous Control Challenges, A Researcher's Perspective , 2005, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[3]  Yaohong Qu,et al.  Fault tolerant control using PID structured optimal technique against actuator faults in a quadrotor UAV , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[4]  P. E. Ross.  When will software have the right stuff? , 2011, IEEE Spectrum.

[5]  Andres Ortiz,et al.  Engineering Safety and Reliability into UAV Systems: Mitigating the Ground Impact Hazard , 2007 .

[6]  A. Viguria,et al.  Analysis and development of a reliable fixed wing UAV control system for mission profiles with restricted GPS availability , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[7]  Paul B. Voss,et al.  Rethinking the regulatory framework for Small Unmanned Aircraft: The case for protecting privacy and property rights in the lowermost reaches of the atmosphere , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[8]  Kevin W Williams,et al.  A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications , 2004 .

[9]  Petros G. Voulgaris,et al.  Distributed control over structured and packet-dropping networks , 2008 .

[10]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Fault tolerant control of a quadrotor UAV using sliding mode control , 2010, 2010 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol).

[11]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  A Review on Fault-Tolerant Control for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2011 .

[12]  R. Loh,et al.  UAVs in civil airspace: Safety requirements , 2009, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[13]  D. Theilliol,et al.  Robust sensor fault diagnosis and tracking controller for a UAV modelled as LPV system , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[14]  Duncan A. Campbell,et al.  RPAS integration within an Australian ATM system: What equipment and which airspace , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[15]  Ella M. Atkins.  Autonomy as an enabler of economically-viable, beyond-line-of-sight, low-altitude UAS applications with acceptable risk , 2014 .

[16]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  System Integration and Operation of a Research Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2004, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[17]  Emerson Alberto Marconato.  LARISSA: Layered architecture model for interconnection of systems in UAS , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[18]  Daniel Fernando Pigatto,et al.  HAMSTER - Healthy, mobility and security-based data communication architecture for Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[19]  H. Aguilar-Sierra,et al.  Fault Estimation for a Quad-Rotor MAV Using a Polynomial Observer , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[20]  John R. Copley.  FAA jurisdiction to regulate UAS operations below minimum altitudes and outside of navigable airspace , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).