Performance evaluation of cellular manufacturing systems: a taxonomy and review of research

The performance of cellular manufacturing (CM) systems has been rigorously investigated during the last two decades. The findings from these studies need to be systematically tabulated, given that they span a wide range of systems and experimental conditions. Some of the findings have also not been in agreement with the prescriptive literature on group technology (GT). No such survey of research exists to date. Attempts to fill the void by providing a taxonomy that categorizes these studies into simulation‐based, analytical and empirical studies. Also discusses past work in the context of various experimental factors and conditions, such as system configurations assumed, setup and operation times, scheduling rules, lot sizes and performance measures used. Summarizes major findings from each stream of literature from the point of view of both researchers and practitioners.

[1]  Chao-Hsien Chu Cluster analysis in manufacturing cellular formation , 1989 .

[2]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  Applications and Implementation: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF CELLULAR (GROUP TECHNOLOGY) LAYOUT WITH PROCESS LAYOUT , 1987 .

[3]  Barbara B. Flynn Repetitive lots: The use of a sequence-dependent set-up time scheduling procedure in group technology and traditional shops , 1987 .

[4]  Rajiv M. Gupta,et al.  An examination of the dynamic behaviour of part-families in group technology , 1982 .

[5]  Nallan C. Suresh Partitioning Work Centers for Group Technology: Insights from an Analytical Model* , 1991 .

[6]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Cellular manufacturing in the U.S. industry: a survey of users , 1989 .

[7]  L. C. Lee,et al.  A study of system characteristics in a manufacturing cell , 1985 .

[8]  S. K. Banerjee Design Rules for a CIM System Edited by R. W. YEOMANS, A. CHOUDRY and P. J. W. TEN HAGEN. (North Holland, 1985.) (Pp. x + 454.) Price US $55.50 Dfl 150.00 , 1987 .

[9]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Lot Sizes, Lead Times and In-Process Inventories , 1987 .

[10]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Lot-Sizing and Lead-time Performance in a Manufacturing Cell , 1985 .

[11]  Inyong Ham,et al.  A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem , 1983 .

[12]  Urban Wemmerlöv Fundamental Insights into Part Family Scheduling: The Single Machine Case , 1992 .

[13]  Nallan C. Suresh Partitioning Work Centers for Group Technology: Analytical Extension and Shop-Level Simulation Investigation* , 1992 .

[14]  T. Er Lot sizing in group technology production systems , 1984 .

[15]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Group technology , 1987 .

[16]  T. J. Greene,et al.  A review of cellular manufacturing assumptions, advantages and design techniques , 1984 .

[17]  Roberta S. Russell,et al.  A Study of Labor Allocation Strategies in Cellular Manufacturing , 1991 .

[18]  Keith L. McRoberts,et al.  On scheduling in a GT environment , 1982 .

[19]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  The introduction of group technology , 1975 .

[20]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Group technology in the US manufacturing industry: A survey of current practices , 1989 .

[21]  John M. Charnes,et al.  Cellular Versus Functional Layouts Under a Variety of Shop Operating Conditions , 1993 .

[22]  Charles T. Mosier,et al.  Analysis of group technology scheduling heuristics , 1984 .

[23]  A. G. Burgess,et al.  Cellular manufacturing: its impact on the total factory , 1993 .

[24]  R. H. Hollier,et al.  A review of production control problems in cellular manufacture , 1984 .

[25]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  REPETITIVE LOTS: FLOW-TIME REDUCTIONS THROUGH SEQUENCING AND DYNAMIC BATCH SIZING , 1988 .

[26]  S. M. Shafer,et al.  A simulation analyses of factors influencing loading practices in cellular manufacturing , 1995 .

[27]  J. R. Crookall,et al.  Some Organizational Aspects of Cellular Manufacture Based on Computer Simulation , 1975 .

[28]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Machine Loading and Product-Mix Analysis for Group Technology , 1978 .

[29]  Jiaqin Yang,et al.  Setup time reduction and competitive advantage in a closed manufacturing cell , 1993 .

[30]  Larry R. Taube,et al.  The facets of group technology and their impacts on implementation--A state-of-the-art survey , 1985 .

[31]  F. Sassani,et al.  A simulation study on performance improvement of group technology cells , 1990 .

[32]  William L. Maxwell,et al.  Theory of scheduling , 1967 .

[33]  R. D. Pullen,et al.  A survey of cellular manufacturing cells , 1976 .

[34]  Barbara B. Flynn The effects of setup time on output capacity in cellular manufacturing , 1987 .

[35]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  A Review of Production Scheduling , 1981, Oper. Res..

[36]  Larry R. Taube,et al.  Weighted similarity measure heuristics for the group technology machine clustering problem , 1985 .

[37]  Ranga V. Ramasesh Dynamic job shop scheduling: A survey of simulation research , 1990 .

[38]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  An evaluation of order releasing and due date assignment heuristics in a cellular manufacturing system , 1990 .

[39]  Mark D. Treleven A Review of the Dual Resource Constrained System Research , 1989 .

[40]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  MRP/GT: a framework for production planning and control of cellular manufacturing , 1982 .

[41]  Dan Louis Shunk THE MEASUREMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF GROUP TECHNOLOGY BY SIMULATION. , 1976 .

[42]  S. Kekre Performance of a Manufacturing Cell with Increased Product Mix , 1987 .

[43]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Job and Family Scheduling of a Flow-Line Manufacturing Cell: A Simulation Study , 1991 .

[44]  Patrick R. Philipoom,et al.  Sequencing rules and due date setting procedures in flow line cells with family setups , 1991 .

[45]  John S. Morris,et al.  A simulation analysis of factors influencing the attractiveness of group technology cellular layouts , 1990 .

[46]  Timothy L. Smunt,et al.  Countering the negative impact of intercell flow in cellular manufacturing / 1991:121 , 1991 .

[47]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  Dynamic Group Scheduling Heuristics in a Flow-through Cell Environment* , 1992 .

[48]  C. L. Ang,et al.  A comparative study of the performance of pure and hybrid group technology manufacturing systems using computer simulation techniques , 1984 .

[49]  N. Singh,et al.  Design of cellular manufacturing systems: An invited review , 1993 .

[50]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  A comparison of exhaustive and non-exhaustive group scheduling heuristics in a manufacturing cell , 1991 .

[51]  Vijay R. Kannan,et al.  Impact of family-based scheduling on transfer batches in a job shop manufacturing cell , 1994 .

[52]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Optimal Group Scheduling and Machining-Speed Decision Under Due-Date Constraints , 1979 .

[53]  Inyong Ham,et al.  Group Scheduling Technique for Multiproduct, Multistage Manufacturing Systems , 1977 .

[54]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of group scheduling heuristics in a job shop cell , 1993 .

[55]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Coping with the Loss of Pooling Synergy in Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 1994 .

[56]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Achieving factory automation through Group Technology principles , 1985 .

[57]  A. G. Burgess Evaluation of group technology/cellular manufacturing: a computer simulation , 1989 .

[58]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  An investigation of dynamic group scheduling heuristics in a job shop manufacturing cell , 1990 .

[59]  N. Hyer The potential of group technology for U.S. manufacturing , 1984 .

[60]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  A simulation comparison of group technology with traditional job shop manufacturing , 1986 .

[61]  Farzad Mahmoodi,et al.  An Investigation of Scheduling Policies in a Dual‐Constrained Manufacturing Cell* , 1993 .

[62]  John S. Morris,et al.  A simulation comparison of process and cellular layouts in a dual resource constrained environment , 1994 .

[63]  Avijit Banerjee,et al.  A simulation study of some maintenance policies in a group technology shop , 1987 .