Event-related fMRI for the suppression of speech-associated artifacts in stuttering

The purpose of this study was to establish functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for the investigation of brain function during overt speech production in stuttering. Up to now this technique has rarely been used for the investigation of speech production paradigms because artifacts related to overt speaking largely impair the sensitivity toward task-related activation. Recently, the temporal delay of the hemodynamic response has been exploited to achieve a suppression of speech-related artifacts. By the limitation to very short utterances (one word), a temporal segregation of the respective effects was accomplished by means of an event-related experimental design. However, the investigation of speech production in persons who stutter requires a more extensive speaking situation. Since longer and more complex utterances evoke more symptoms of stuttering than reading of single words, a useful task should at least include the reading of full sentences. In this study we performed simulations to investigate the correlation of speech-related artifacts with the respective hemodynamic response in dependency on speech duration and rate of data sampling. Furthermore, we show that prolonged stimulus durations and repetition times of 3 s still allow an effective suppression of speech-related artifacts in fluent as well as in nonfluent speakers. Not only were obvious false activations at high contrast cerebrospinal fluid tissue borders widely eliminated, subjects also displayed consistent activation in speech-related and motor areas. As these results widely resemble those obtained by earlier neuroimaging studies on language production, event-related fMRI seems to be capable of recording neurophysiological correlates of overt speech production.

[1]  E. Achten,et al.  Functional MR pilot study of speech and language related to stuttering , 2000 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event-related fMRI , 1997 .

[3]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Hajnal,et al.  A Registration and Interpolation Procedure for Subvoxel Matching of Serially Acquired MR Images , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Wingate The Structure of Stuttering: A Psycholinguistic Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  S. Small,et al.  Localizing the lexicon for reading aloud: replication of a PET study using fMRI , 1996, Neuroreport.

[9]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Peters,et al.  Recent Developments in Speech Motor Research into Stuttering , 1999, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[11]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[12]  Jia Fc,et al.  [Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging]. , 2001, Sheng li ke xue jin zhan [Progress in physiology].

[13]  M Bach,et al.  Coupling of neural activity and BOLD fMRI response: New insights by combination of fMRI and VEP experiments in transition from single events to continuous stimulation , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  C. Price The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[17]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Comparison of the hemodynamic response to different visual stimuli in single‐event and block stimulation fMRI experiments , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  R W Cox,et al.  Event‐related fMRI of tasks involving brief motion , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[19]  R W Cox,et al.  Magnetic field changes in the human brain due to swallowing or speaking , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus‐correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[24]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Word Stem Completion , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[26]  Y. Yen,et al.  False cerebral activation on BOLD functional MR images: study of low-amplitude motion weakly correlated to stimulus. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.