CHARACTERIZING THE SERVICES OF A REHABILITATION CENTRE SPECIALIZED IN SPINAL CORD INJURY/DISORDER USING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF SERVICE ORGANIZATION IN REHABILITATION 2.0 AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH REPORTING: A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Objectives To characterize the services of a rehabilitation centre specialized in spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) using the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R) 2.0, and to evaluate its potential use in meeting health reporting and certification requirements. Methods The post-acute and outpatient rehabilitation services at this specialized SCI/D centre were described, the SCI/D Framework of rehabilitation service type definitions considered, various rehabilitation centre stakeholders were consulted, and data were collected using the centre’s digital quality management system and institutional management tool. A structured internet search identified the national health reporting and certification systems relevant for SCI/D rehabilitation. The resulting systems were subsequently mapped with ICSO-R 2.0 categories. Results ICSO-R 2.0 categories pertaining to the provider dimension were generally the same across the post-acute and outpatient services. ICSO-R 2.0 highlighted the nuances in service delivery between these 2 service types. Most of the categories could be mapped to at least 1 of the 10 health reporting and certification systems detected in the website search. Conclusion ICSO-R 2.0 can be used to comprehensively describe the rehabilitation services of a specialized SCI/D centre in Switzerland. Despite some challenges, ISCO-R 2.0 has the potential to facilitate national health reporting and certification. LAY ABSTRACT The International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R) 2.0 has been developed to characterize rehabilitation services in different fields of rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to characterize different rehabilitation services in a centre specialized in spinal cord injury and disorder. Out of 9 rehabilitation services detected, post-acute and outpatient services were described. ICSO-R 2.0 highlighted the nuances in service delivery between these 2 service types. Most of the categories could be mapped to at least 1 of the 10 health reporting and certification systems detected in the website search. Despite some challenges, ISCO-R 2.0 has the potential to facilitate national health reporting and certification.

[1]  G. Stucki,et al.  The Nottwil Standard-Development and Implementation of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Based Clinical Standard Assessment for Post-acute Rehabilitation After Newly Acquired Spinal Cord Injury , 2021, Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.

[2]  A. Curt,et al.  Towards the implementation of clinical quality management at the national level. Describing current types of rehabilitation services for Spinal Cord Injury/ Disorder in Switzerland using an interdisciplinary consensus process. , 2021, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  B. Nugraha,et al.  DESCRIBING COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION SERVICES IN INDONESIA BY USING THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF SERVICE ORGANIZATION IN REHABILITATION 2.0 , 2021, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  H. Stam,et al.  Reflections of the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine on the first global estimates of the need for rehabilitation and the implications for physical and rehabilitation medicine. , 2020, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  M. Kirkevold,et al.  Description of health-related rehabilitation service provision and delivery in randomized controlled trials: A topic review. , 2020, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  B. Nugraha,et al.  International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation: An updated set of categories. , 2019, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  A. Cieza Rehabilitation the Health Strategy of the 21st Century, Really? , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  P. Larsen,et al.  Rehabilitation 2030: A Call for Action. , 2019, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[9]  G. Stucki,et al.  European framework of rehabilitation services types: the perspective of the physical and rehabilitation medicine section and board of the european union of medical specialists. , 2019, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  G. Stucki,et al.  Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems Worldwide by Implementing Information on Functioning in Rehabilitation Practice, Quality Management, and Policy , 2018, The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

[11]  C. Gutenbrunner,et al.  European initiative for the application of the International Classification of Service Organization in Health-related Rehabilitation (ICSO-R). , 2017, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  G. Stucki,et al.  Practice, science and governance in interaction: European effort for the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. , 2017, European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

[13]  G. Stucki,et al.  Specifying clinical assessment schedules for the European framework of rehabilitation service types: the perspective of the physical and rehabilitation medicine section and board of the European Union of medical specialists. , 2019, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  M. Kirkevold,et al.  The challenges of describing rehabilitation services: A discussion paper. , 2018, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[15]  G. Stucki,et al.  ISPRM discussion paper: proposing dimensions for an International Classification System for Service Organization in Health-related Rehabilitation. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.