Bias field inhomogeneity measurements

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is affected by intensity inhomogeneity where the illuminated areas alternate with shadow areas. The phenomenon of inhomogeneity is barely noticeable by the human observer, but in the field of automated image segmentation or registration, the unwanted intensity variations can cause significant errors. An important step in image processing is the evaluation of the inhomogeneity and the adequate correction of this artifact. In this paper we have proposed to measure the inhomogeneity with the most well-known quantitative formulas. We shall also put forward two new measurement methods: one for direct measurement and one for indirect measurement. The first method measures the smoothness of the bias field ratio, regardless the used correction algorithm. The second defines a procedure and an image function for inhomogeneity evaluation. The values obtained point the inhomogeneity level out and suppress the white noise better than the usual algorithms. We used simulated MR images obtained from the Brain Web site in the quantitative and comparative evaluations. The results obtained, when compared to existing methods, show a significant confidence level for the proposed measurements.

[1]  J. G. Sled,et al.  Intensity Nonuniformity Correction , 2015 .

[2]  R. Stafford,et al.  A comparison of five standard methods for evaluating image intensity uniformity in partially parallel imaging MRI. , 2013, Medical physics.

[3]  Emma B. Lewis,et al.  Correction of differential intensity inhomogeneity in longitudinal MR images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Joël M. H. Karel,et al.  Measures for the evaluation of bias field removal procedures in MRI and the design of wavelets for suppression of RF inhomogeneities , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Yunjie Chen,et al.  Review for Intensity Inhomogeneity Estimate Method , 2011, 2011 Fourth International Conference on Information and Computing.

[8]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  A. Davenel,et al.  Correction of intensity nonuniformity in spin-echo T(1)-weighted images. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Interplay between bias field correction, intensity standardization, and noise filtering for T2-weighted MRI , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  László Szilágyi,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Intensity Inhomogeneity Compensation Using c-Means Clustering Models , 2011, CIARP.

[12]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Six Algorithms for Correcting Intensity Nonuniformity Effects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  Weili Zheng,et al.  Evaluation of performance metrics for bias field correction in MR brain images , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Seiya Kai Correction of the local intensity nonuniformity artifact in high field MRI , 2012 .