Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes

Abstract The availability of a system under a given failure/repair process is a function of time which can be determined through a set of integral equations and usually calculated numerically. We focus here on the issue of carrying out sensitivity analysis of availability to determine the influence of the input parameters. The main purpose is to study the sensitivity of the system availability with respect to the changes in the main parameters. In the simplest case that the failure repair process is (continuous time/discrete state) Markovian, explicit formulae are well known. Unfortunately, in more general cases availability is often a complicated function of the parameters without closed form solution. Thus, the computation of sensitivity measures would be time-consuming or even infeasible. In this paper, we show how Sobol and other related sensitivity measures can be cheaply computed to measure how changes in the model inputs (failure/repair times) influence the outputs (availability measure). We use a Bayesian framework, called the Bayesian analysis of computer code output (BACCO) which is based on using the Gaussian process as an emulator (i.e., an approximation) of complex models/functions. This approach allows effective sensitivity analysis to be achieved by using far smaller numbers of model runs than other methods. The emulator-based sensitivity measure is used to examine the influence of the failure and repair densities' parameters on the system availability. We discuss how to apply the methods practically in the reliability context, considering in particular the selection of parameters and prior distributions and how we can ensure these may be considered independent—one of the key assumptions of the Sobol approach. The method is illustrated on several examples, and we discuss the further implications of the technique for reliability and maintenance analysis.

[1]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[2]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Distribution-based global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2010 .

[4]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Distribution-based global sensitivity analysis in case of correlated input parameters using polynomial chaos expansions , 2011 .

[6]  J. C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty , 1997 .

[7]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[8]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  [Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments]: Rejoinder , 1989 .

[9]  Tieling Zhang,et al.  Availability and reliability of system with dependent components and time-varying failure and repair rates , 2001, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[10]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Model emulation and moment-independent sensitivity analysis: An application to environmental modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  U. Jensen Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2002 .

[12]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models , 2010 .

[13]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[14]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[15]  Gareth W. Parry,et al.  The characterization of uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessments of complex systems , 1996 .

[16]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[17]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Yucca Mountain 2008 Performance Assessment: Incorporation of seismic hazard curve uncertainty. , 2011 .

[18]  Hiromitsu Kumamoto,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists , 1996 .

[19]  John Quigley,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a reliability system using Gaussian processes , 2008 .

[20]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Gregery T. Buzzard,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using sparse grid interpolation and polynomial chaos , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems , 1994 .

[24]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  A new uncertainty importance measure , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  BorgonovoE.,et al.  Model emulation and moment-independent sensitivity analysis , 2012 .

[26]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[27]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[28]  M. Ratto,et al.  Using recursive algorithms for the efficient identification of smoothing spline ANOVA models , 2010 .

[29]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  First-order differential sensitivity analysis of a nuclear safety system by Monte Carlo simulation , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..