On the complexity of zero gap MIP

The class $\mathsf{MIP}^*$ is the set of languages decidable by multiprover interactive proofs with quantum entangled provers. It was recently shown by Ji, Natarajan, Vidick, Wright and Yuen that $\mathsf{MIP}^*$ is equal to $\mathsf{RE}$, the set of recursively enumerable languages. In particular this shows that the complexity of approximating the quantum value of a non-local game $G$ is equivalent to the complexity of the Halting problem. In this paper we investigate the complexity of deciding whether the quantum value of a non-local game $G$ is exactly $1$. This problem corresponds to a complexity class that we call zero gap $\mathsf{MIP}^*$, denoted by $\mathsf{MIP}^*_0$, where there is no promise gap between the verifier's acceptance probabilities in the YES and NO cases. We prove that $\mathsf{MIP}^*_0$ extends beyond the first level of the arithmetical hierarchy (which includes $\mathsf{RE}$ and its complement $\mathsf{coRE}$), and in fact is equal to $\Pi_2^0$, the class of languages that can be decided by quantified formulas of the form $\forall y \, \exists z \, R(x,y,z)$. Combined with the previously known result that $\mathsf{MIP}^{co}_0$ (the commuting operator variant of $\mathsf{MIP}^*_0$) is equal to $\mathsf{coRE}$, our result further highlights the fascinating connection between various models of quantum multiprover interactive proofs and different classes in computability theory.

[1]  Gus Gutoski,et al.  Toward a general theory of quantum games , 2006, STOC '07.

[2]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[3]  Joseph Fitzsimons,et al.  Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[4]  T. Fritz TSIRELSON'S PROBLEM AND KIRCHBERG'S CONJECTURE , 2010, 1008.1168.

[5]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  MIP* = RE , 2020, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Zheng-Feng Ji,et al.  Compression of quantum multi-prover interactive proofs , 2016, STOC.

[7]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  NEEXP in MIP , 2019, FOCS 2019.

[8]  M. Junge,et al.  Connes' embedding problem and Tsirelson's problem , 2010, 1008.1142.

[9]  William Slofstra,et al.  THE SET OF QUANTUM CORRELATIONS IS NOT CLOSED , 2017, Forum of Mathematics, Pi.

[10]  R. Cleve,et al.  HOW TO SHARE A QUANTUM SECRET , 1999, quant-ph/9901025.

[11]  Isaac Goldbring ENFORCEABLE OPERATOR ALGEBRAS , 2017, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu.

[12]  A. Acín,et al.  A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations , 2008, 0803.4290.

[13]  Narutaka Ozawa,et al.  About the Connes Embedding Conjecture---Algebraic approaches--- , 2012, 1212.1700.

[15]  Matthew Coudron,et al.  Complexity lower bounds for computing the approximately-commuting operator value of non-local games to high precision , 2019, CCC.

[16]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability assumptions , 2019, STOC '88.

[17]  Narutaka Ozawa,et al.  About the Connes embedding conjecture , 2013 .