The effect of virtuality on the functioning of centralized versus decentralized structures—an information processing perspective

Does virtuality in organizations require centralization or decentralization? We specify the coordination and information processing requirements for virtual organizing in order to examine how these requirements are met by centralized and decentralized structural designs, respectively. We use the agent based SimVision computational discrete event simulation model as our experimental platform to develop concise and comparable measures of the information processing needs of virtual organizing, and how these are met by the information processing capabilities of the centralized and decentralized structures. Contrary to conventional wisdom, that the centralized form is more effective in virtual settings than the decentralized form.

[1]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[2]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Computational Modeling of Organizations Comes of Age , 2004, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[3]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Face-to-Face: Making Network Organizations Work , 1992 .

[4]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Computational experimentation on new organizational forms: Exploring behavior and performance of Edge organizations , 2007, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[5]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[6]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[7]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2006 .

[8]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[9]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[10]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[11]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  The Effect of Task Uncertainty and Decentralization on Project Team Performance , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[12]  Yan Jin,et al.  Simulating Project Work Processes and Organizations: Toward a Micro-Contingency Theory of Organizational Design , 1999 .

[13]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance? , 2000, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[15]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[16]  Janaki Mythily Kumar,et al.  Working as a designer in a global team , 2006, INTR.

[17]  K. Arrow.  The limits of organization , 1974 .

[18]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[19]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[20]  M. Tushman.  Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[21]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work , 1999, GROUP.

[22]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams , 2006, CSCW '06.

[24]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  New Information Technology and Organizational Culture , 1982, MIS Q..

[25]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Simulation modeling in organizational and management research , 2007 .

[27]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration , 2000, CSCW '00.

[28]  R. Burton,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design , 1995 .

[29]  T. Kippenberger.  When is virtual virtuous , 1997 .

[30]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups , 1955 .

[31]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[32]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[33]  Heather Hamblin,et al.  Employees' Perspectives on One Dimension of Labour Flexibility: Working at a Distance , 1995 .

[34]  Børge Obel,et al.  The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[35]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[36]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[38]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[39]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[40]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[41]  楠木 建,et al.  The modularity trap : innovation, technology phase-shifts, and resulting limits of virtual organizations , 1999 .

[42]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual Organization - Introduction to the Special Section. , 1997 .

[43]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[44]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Yan Jin,et al.  The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance , 1994 .

[46]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[47]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  THE SPATIAL, TEMPORAL, AND CONFIGURATIONALCHARACTERISTICS OF GEOGRAPHIC DISPERSIONIN TEAMS , 2007 .

[48]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[49]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[50]  Modeling and Analyzing Cultural Influences , 2005 .

[51]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  Telecommuting: Justice and Control in the Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[52]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[53]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[54]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[55]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[56]  Xiaojing Liu,et al.  The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students' learning and virtual team performance , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Understanding Command and Control , 2011 .

[58]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[59]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[60]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[61]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  Computational Laboratories for Organization Science: Questions, Validity and Docking , 2003, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[62]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[63]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[64]  Børge Obel,et al.  Embedding Virtuality into Organization Design Theory: Virtuality and Its Information Processing Consequences , 2009 .

[65]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Unpacking Dynamic Capability: A Design Perspective , 2009 .