Plant Functional Diversity and Species Diversity in the Mongolian Steppe

Background The Mongolian steppe is one of the most important grasslands in the world but suffers from aridization and damage from anthropogenic activities. Understanding structure and function of this community is important for the ecological conservation, but has seldom been investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings In this study, a total of 324 quadrats located on the three main types of Mongolian steppes were surveyed. Early-season perennial forbs (37% of total importance value), late-season annual forbs (33%) and late-season perennial forbs (44%) were dominant in meadow, typical and desert steppes, respectively. Species richness, diversity and plant functional type (PFT) richness decreased from the meadow, via typical to desert steppes, but evenness increased; PFT diversity in the desert and meadow steppes was higher than that in typical steppe. However, above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) was far lower in desert steppe than in the other two steppes. In addition, the slope of the relationship between species richness and PFT richness increased from the meadow, via typical to desert steppes. Similarly, with an increase in species diversity, PFT diversity increased more quickly in both the desert and typical steppes than that in meadow steppe. Random resampling suggested that this coordination was partly due to a sampling effect of diversity. Conclusions/Significance These results indicate that desert steppe should be strictly protected because of its limited functional redundancy, which its ecological functioning is sensitive to species loss. In contrast, despite high potential forage production shared by the meadow and typical steppes, management of these two types of steppes should be different: meadow steppe should be preserved due to its higher conservation value characterized by more species redundancy and higher spatial heterogeneity, while typical steppe could be utilized moderately because its dominant grass genus Stipa is resistant to herbivory and drought.

[1]  J. White.  The Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss , 2001 .

[2]  W. Whitford,et al.  The effect of water and nitrogen amendments on photosynthesis, leaf demography, and resource-use efficiency in Larrea tridentata, a desert evergreen shrub , 1989, Oecologia.

[3]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  Species diversity enhances ecosystem functioning through interspecific facilitation , 2002, Nature.

[5]  K. Vanderbilt,et al.  Soil heterogeneity and the distribution of desert and steppe plant species across a desert-grassland ecotone , 2007 .

[6]  J. P. Grime.  Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation , 1973 .

[7]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  A consumer's guide to evenness indices , 1996 .

[8]  Sara Taskinen,et al.  smatr 3– an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines , 2012 .

[9]  J. Emmett Duffy.  Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning , 2003 .

[10]  C. Clement.  The Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss , 2002 .

[11]  M. Shinoda,et al.  Environmental controls on photosynthetic production and ecosystem respiration in semi-arid grasslands of Mongolia , 2008 .

[12]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[13]  Amy J. Symstad,et al.  Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning , 2002 .

[14]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Axillary bud viability and dry matter production of Poa ligularis in Patagonian grasslands: (with 1 table & 4 figures) , 2004 .

[15]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[16]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[17]  Toru M. Nakamura,et al.  Phytosociological study of steppe vegetation in Mongolia , 2008 .

[18]  W. Renzhong,et al.  Climate-driven changes in shoot density and shoot biomass in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) on the North-east China Transect (NECT) , 2003 .

[19]  E. Chaneton,et al.  Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient. , 2007, Ecology.

[20]  Yong-zhong Su,et al.  Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China , 2005 .

[21]  A. Buttler,et al.  Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effects of variability and spatial configuration , 2006 .

[22]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Plant functional types and climate at the global scale , 1996 .

[23]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[24]  H. Azadi,et al.  Rangeland degradation in North China: perceptions of pastoralists. , 2010, Environmental research.

[25]  Adam Skibbe,et al.  Functional consequences of climate change-induced plant species loss in a tallgrass prairie , 2011, Oecologia.

[26]  Joseph P. Romano,et al.  On the asymptotic theory of subsampling , 1999 .

[27]  Zhao Xinquan,et al.  Large scale patterns of forage yield and quality across Chinese grasslands , 2013 .

[28]  J. A. Camargo.  On measuring species evenness and other associated parameters of community structure , 1995 .

[29]  M. Fernández-Giménez,et al.  Vegetation change along gradients from water sources in three grazed Mongolian ecosystems , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[30]  S. Díaz,et al.  Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes , 2001 .

[31]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient , 2012 .

[32]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[33]  I. Stirling,et al.  Ecological Dynamics Across the Arctic Associated with Recent Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[34]  E. Chaneton,et al.  Disturbance effects on plant community diversity: spatial scales and dominance hierarchies , 1991, Vegetatio.

[35]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective , 2009 .

[36]  M. Sugita,et al.  An overview of the rangelands atmosphere–hydrosphere–biosphere interaction study experiment in northeastern Asia (RAISE) , 2006, Journal of Hydrology.

[37]  D. Tilman,et al.  Species loss and ecosystem functioning : effects of species identity and community composition , 1998 .

[38]  M. Bertness,et al.  Positive interactions in communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[40]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[41]  C. Harley.  Climate Change, Keystone Predation, and Biodiversity Loss , 2011, Science.

[42]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Functional Diversity — at the Crossroads between Ecosystem Functioning and Environmental Filters , 2007 .

[43]  G. W. Hardy.  Soil Testing and Plant Analysis , 1969 .

[44]  B. Yong.  On the Small Scale Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Moisture, Carbon and Nitrogen in Stipa Communities of the Inner Mongolia Plateau , 2002 .

[45]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  ECOSYSTEM CONSEQUENCES OF BIODIVERSITY LOSS: THE EVOLUTION OF A PARADIGM , 2002 .

[46]  E. DeLucia,et al.  Climate‐driven changes in biomass allocation in pines , 2000 .

[47]  J. Bullock,et al.  Nitrogen deposition causes widespread loss of species richness in British habitats , 2010 .

[48]  M. Dong,et al.  Variation in plant diversity and dominance across dune fixation stages in the Chinese steppe zone , 2012 .