A computational model of the shrimp-goby escape and communication system

Fish escape from approaching threats via a stereotyped escape behavior. This behavior, and the underlying neural circuit organized around the Mauthner cell command neurons, have both been extensively investigated experimentally, mainly in two laboratory model organisms, the goldfish and the zebrafish. However, fish biodiversity is enormous, a number of variants of the basal escape behavior exist. In marine gobies (a family of small benthic fishes) which share burrows with alpheid shrimp, the escape behavior has likely been partially modified into a tactile communication system which allow the fish to communicate the approach of a predatory fish to the shrimp. In this communication system, the goby responds to intermediate-strength threats with a brief tail-flick which the shrimp senses with its antennae.We investigated the shrimp goby escape and communication system with computational models. We asked how the circuitry of the basal escape behavior could be modified to produce behavior akin to the shrimp-goby communication system. In a simple model, we found that mutual inhibitions between Mauthner cells can be tuned to produce an oscillatory response to intermediate strength inputs, albeit only in a narrow parameter range.Using a more detailed model, we found that two modifications of the fish locomotor system transform it into a model reproducing the shrimp goby behavior. These modifications are: 1. modifying the central pattern generator which drives swimming such that it is quiescent when receiving no inputs; 2. introducing a direct sensory input to this central pattern generator, bypassing the Mauthner cells.

[1]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems - a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students , 2002, Software, environments, tools.

[2]  I. Karplus,et al.  Goby-shrimp partner specificity. I. Distribution in the northern Red Sea and partner specificity , 1981 .

[3]  I. Karplus Goby-shrimp partner specificity. II. The behavioural mechanisms regulating partner specificity , 1981 .

[4]  I. Karplus,et al.  The Partnership between Gobiid Fishes and Burrowing Alpheid Shrimps , 2008 .

[5]  Violeta Medan,et al.  The Mauthner-cell circuit of fish as a model system for startle plasticity , 2014, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[6]  P. Domenici,et al.  Preparing for escape: anti-predator posture and fast-start performance in gobies , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  K. M. Stiefel,et al.  The marine goby – alpheid shrimp symbiosis does not correlate with larger fish eye size , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  J. L. Preston,et al.  Communication systems and social interactions in a goby-shrimp symbiosis , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  D L Meyer,et al.  The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Yiwen Zeng,et al.  Visual acuity of the goby-associated shrimp, Alpheus rapax Fabricius, 1798 (Decapoda, Alpheidae) , 2012 .

[11]  Erich D. Jarvis,et al.  Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  L. Holland,et al.  Gene Duplication, Co-Option and Recruitment during the Origin of the Vertebrate Brain from the Invertebrate Chordate Brain , 2008, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[13]  Melina E. Hale,et al.  Neural circuits that drive startle behavior, with a focus on the Mauthner cells and spiral fiber neurons of fishes , 2016, Journal of neurogenetics.

[14]  David Terman,et al.  Mathematical foundations of neuroscience , 2010 .

[15]  D. Faber,et al.  ■ Review : The Mauthner Cell: What Has it Taught us? , 2000 .

[16]  Fadi A. Issa,et al.  Effects of Social Experience on the Habituation Rate of Zebrafish Startle Escape Response: Empirical and Computational Analyses , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.