Influence of the geomembrane on time-lapse ERT measurements for leachate injection monitoring.

Leachate recirculation is a key process in the operation of municipal waste landfills as bioreactors. To quantify the water content and to evaluate the leachate injection system, in situ methods are required to obtain spatially distributed information, usually electrical resistivity tomography (ERT). However, this method can present false variations in the observations due to several parameters. This study investigates the impact of the geomembrane on ERT measurements. Indeed, the geomembrane tends to be ignored in the inversion process in most previously conducted studies. The presence of the geomembrane can change the boundary conditions of the inversion models, which have classically infinite boundary conditions. Using a numerical modelling approach, the authors demonstrate that a minimum distance is required between the electrode line and the geomembrane to satisfy the good conditions of use of the classical inversion tools. This distance is a function of the electrode line length (i.e. of the unit electrode spacing) used, the array type and the orientation of the electrode line. Moreover, this study shows that if this criterion on the minimum distance is not satisfied, it is possible to significantly improve the inversion process by introducing the complex geometry and the geomembrane location into the inversion tools. These results are finally validated on a field data set gathered on a small municipal solid waste landfill cell where this minimum distance criterion cannot be satisfied.

[1]  Bo Olofsson,et al.  Tracing leachates at waste sites using geophysical and geochemical modelling , 2006 .

[2]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Inversion of resistivity in Magnetic Resonance Sounding , 2008 .

[3]  C. Aran,et al.  Leachate recirculation: moisture content assessment by means of a geophysical technique. , 2004, Waste management.

[4]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[5]  Mostafa Warith,et al.  Bioreactor landfills: experimental and field results. , 2002, Waste management.

[6]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[7]  R Clément,et al.  Contribution of 3-D time-lapse ERT to the study of leachate recirculation in a landfill. , 2011, Waste management.

[8]  T. Günther Inversion methods and resolution analysis for the 2D/3D reconstruction of resistivity structures from DC measurements , 2004 .

[9]  Michael C. R. Davies,et al.  Application of electrical imaging to leachate plume evolution studies under in-situ and model conditions , 2005 .

[10]  Roger Guérin,et al.  Review of state of the art methods for measuring water in landfills. , 2007, Waste management.

[11]  Giancarlo Dal Moro,et al.  Time‐lapse tomography , 2003 .

[12]  A. Binley,et al.  Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles. , 2002 .

[13]  Giulliana Mondelli,et al.  Geoenvironmental site investigation using different techniques in a municipal solid waste disposal site in Brazil , 2007 .

[14]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  Bioreactor landfills: progress continues. , 2004, Waste management.

[15]  R. P. Beaven Time lapse electrical imaging to study fluid movement within a landfill , 2007 .

[16]  R Clément,et al.  Improvement of electrical resistivity tomography for leachate injection monitoring. , 2010, Waste management.

[17]  M. Loke,et al.  Time-lapse resistivity imaging inversion , 1999 .

[18]  Jianwen Yang,et al.  Geo-Electrical Responses Associated with Hydrothermal Fluid Circulation in Oceanic Crust: Feasibility of Magnetometric and Electrical Resistivity Methods in Mapping Off-Axis Convection Cells , 2005 .

[19]  Andy Fourie,et al.  Mapping of Leachate Plums at Two Landfill Sites in South Africa Using Geoelectrical Imaging Techniques , 2003 .

[20]  P. Bauer‐Gottwein,et al.  Hydrogeophysical exploration of three-dimensional salinity anomalies with the time-domain electromagnetic method (TDEM) , 2010 .

[21]  T. Dahlin The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques , 2001 .

[22]  Pradeep Jain,et al.  Field evaluation of resistivity sensors for in situ moisture measurement in a bioreactor landfill. , 2009, Waste management.

[23]  Rita Deiana,et al.  Characterization of a dismissed landfill via electrical resistivity tomography and mise-à-la-masse method , 2013 .

[24]  V. Naudet,et al.  Monitoring landfill cover by electrical resistivity tomography on an experimental site , 2012 .

[25]  M. M. Mohan Kumar,et al.  Characterization of seasonal local recharge using electrical resistivity tomography and magnetic resonance sounding , 2008 .

[26]  G. Buselli,et al.  Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods , 2001 .

[27]  A. Tabbagh,et al.  Monitoring of Leachate Recirculation in a Bioreactor Landfill by 2-D Electrical Resistivity Imaging , 2008 .

[28]  Gregory N. Tsokas,et al.  Combined weighted inversion of electrical resistivity data arising from different array types , 2007 .

[29]  Frederick D. Day-Lewis,et al.  Time‐lapse imaging of saline‐tracer transport in fractured rock using difference‐attenuation radar tomography , 2003 .

[30]  W. Hogland,et al.  DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: two pre-excavation surveys , 2000 .

[31]  N. Vasuki,et al.  Findings from long-term monitoring studies at MSW landfill facilities with leachate recirculation. , 2003, Waste management.