Quantitative risk level estimation of business process reengineering efforts

With risk defined as the possibility of deviation in the results from the expected goals, business process reengineering (BPR) initiatives clearly involve risk taking. However, due to the high expected returns of such efforts, the acceptable risk levels of BPR will tend to be greater than those of less ambitious projects. This research reports the development of a tool to quantitatively estimate the potential risk level of a BPR effort before an organization commits its resources to that effort. The underlying research employed a survey of BPR‐experienced organizations to collect assessment information in order to build a BPR risk estimation model. The developed tool uses triangular fuzzy numbers to approximate the degree of success/failure of proposed BPR initiatives. The tool can be applied by any organization contemplating BPR, thus giving such organizations a heretofore unavailable estimate of the risk level of proposed BPR efforts. Validation was performed based upon an 18‐month BPR project conducted at the Missouri Lottery.

[1]  Madan M. Gupta,et al.  Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science , 1988 .

[2]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Selecting BPR projects based on strategic objectives , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[3]  Philippe Jorion,et al.  Risk2: Measuring the Risk in Value at Risk , 1996 .

[4]  W. F. Ames Fuzzy relation equations and their applications to knowledge engineering , 1990 .

[5]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Relation Equations and Their Applications to Knowledge Engineering , 1989, Theory and Decision Library.

[6]  W. Sharpe The Sharpe Ratio , 1994 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[9]  Jaejung Lee,et al.  An exploratory study of organizational/managerial factors influencing business process reengineering implementation: An empirical study of critical success factors and resistance management , 1995 .

[10]  David Spaulding Measuring Investment Performance: Calculating and Evaluating Investment Risk and Return , 1997 .

[11]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  I - Anatomy , 1993 .

[14]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  An Anatomy of Risk , 1978 .

[15]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[16]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[17]  P. Glasserman,et al.  Variance Reduction Techniques for Estimating Value-at-Risk , 2000 .

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  PRECONDITIONS FOR BPR SUCCESS And How to Prevent Failures , 1994 .

[19]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[20]  Robert G. Easierling An Anatomy of Risk , 1977 .