Pattern recognition as a tool to discriminate softwood and hardwood bark fractions with different particle size

Abstract The aim of this study was to characterize the chemical composition of different granulometric fractions obtained by milling of the bark of two softwood [Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris L.] and two hardwood species (birch, Betula pendula Roth, and eucalypt, Eucalyptus globulus Labill.), and to discriminate between them on the basis of their chemical composition content via pattern recognition techniques [principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA), and discriminant analysis (DA)]. Bark chemical composition differed between species, and chemical variables could be used to differentiate between them. Size reduction yields granulometric fractions that are not chemically homogeneous and that can also be discriminated. Therefore, potential applications of bark in valorization programs have to carefully consider the species-specific composition and their size reduction patterns. PCA and CA were adequate tools to characterize the different bark fractions within each species. DA allowed identifying the bark samples according to species and independently from particle size. Pattern recognition statistical methods were shown to be useful tools to analyse bark fractions and chemically discriminate species and fractions.

[1]  Roger M. Rowell,et al.  Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. , 2005 .

[2]  J. Hemming,et al.  Knotwood and bark extracts: strong antioxidants from waste materials , 2006, Journal of Wood Science.

[3]  Antonio Pizzi,et al.  Tannins: Major Sources, Properties and Applications , 2008, Monomers, Polymers and Composites from Renewable Resources.

[4]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Developments in Field Experiment Design and Analysis , 1976 .

[5]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Biorefineries: For Biomass Upgrading Facilities , 2009 .

[6]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[7]  J. Gominho,et al.  Characterisation and fractioning of Tectona grandis bark in view of its valorisation as a biorefinery raw-material , 2013 .

[8]  A. C. Rencher Methods of multivariate analysis , 1995 .

[9]  E. Cadahía,et al.  Polyphenolic composition of bark extracts fromEucalyptus camaldulensis, E. globulus andE. rudis , 1996, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[10]  J. Gominho,et al.  Fractioning and chemical characterization of barks of Betula pendula and Eucalyptus globulus. , 2013 .

[11]  A. Hatakka,et al.  Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) bark composition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate for bioremediation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[12]  J. Gominho,et al.  Chemical characterization of barks from Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris after fractioning into different particle sizes , 2012 .

[13]  Boris Mirkin,et al.  Mathematical Classification and Clustering , 1996 .

[14]  N E Tzouros,et al.  Agricultural Produces: Synopsis of Employed Quality Control Methods for the Authentication of Foods and Application of Chemometrics for the Classification of Foods According to Their Variety or Geographical Origin , 2001, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[15]  H. Pereira,et al.  The chemical composition of cork and phloem in the rhytidome of Quercus cerris bark , 2010 .

[16]  F. Keulen,et al.  Pattern recognition of lipase-catalyzed or chemically interesterified fat blends containing n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids , 2008 .

[17]  Darinka Brodnjak-Vončina,et al.  Multivariate data analysis in classification of vegetable oils characterized by the content of fatty acids , 2005 .

[18]  Iain S. Donnison,et al.  Influence of particle size on the analytical and chemical properties of two energy crops , 2007 .

[19]  M. Ruiz-Méndez,et al.  Characterization and chemometric study of crude and refined oils from table olive by-products , 2008 .

[20]  Pattern recognition of acorns from different Quercus species based on oil content and fatty acid profile , 2003 .

[21]  H. Kofujita,et al.  Characterization of the major components in bark from five Japanese tree species for chemical utilization , 1999, Wood Science and Technology.

[22]  R. C. Baldwin,et al.  The Relationship Of Extractive Content To Particle Size Distribution In Milled Yellow-Poplar ( Liriodendron Tulipifera L.) Bark , 2007 .

[23]  Beatriz P. P. Oliveira,et al.  Chemometric characterization of three varietal olive oils (Cvs. Cobrançosa, Madural and Verdeal Transmontana) extracted from olives with different maturation indices , 2007 .

[24]  Gabriela Ghizzi Damasceno da Silva,et al.  Successive centrifugal grinding and sieving of wheat straw , 2011 .