The case for aggressivepartial preloadingin broadcasting protocols for video-on-demand

Broadcasting protocols for video-on-demand usually consume over fifty percent of their bandwidth to distribute the first ten to fifteen minutes of the videos they distribute. Since all these protocols require the user set-top box to include a disk drive, we propose to use this drive to store the first five to twenty minutes of the ten to twenty most popular videos. This will provide low-cost instant access to these videos.

[1]  Darrell D. E. Long,et al.  A universal distribution protocol for video-on-demand , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No.00TH8532).

[2]  Li-Ming Tseng,et al.  Harmonic broadcasting for video-on-demand service , 1997, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[3]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Metropolitan area video-on-demand service using pyramid broadcasting , 1996, Multimedia Systems.

[4]  Darrell D. E. Long,et al.  Zero-delay broadcasting protocols for video-on-demand , 1999, MULTIMEDIA '99.

[5]  Kien A. Hua,et al.  Skyscraper broadcasting: a new broadcasting scheme for metropolitan video-on-demand systems , 1997, SIGCOMM '97.

[6]  Li-Ming Tseng,et al.  Fast data broadcasting and receiving scheme for popular video service , 1998, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[7]  Mary K. Vernon,et al.  Dynamic Skyscraper Broadcasts for Video-on-Demand , 1998, Multimedia Information Systems.

[8]  Jehan-François Pâris A simple low-bandwidth broadcasting protocol for video-on-demand , 1999, Proceedings Eight International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat. No.99EX370).