Relation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system with histological risk classification for primary eyelid basal cell carcinoma

Purpose: To investigate the relation between the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and histological risk classification for primary eyelid basal cell carcinoma. Methods: Retrospective, observational case series of patients undergoing excisional biopsy for primary eyelid basal cell carcinoma in two tertiary centres between 2008 and 2018. Patients with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. Outcomes measured included histological subtype, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7 and 8 staging. Results: A total of 222 cases were included over a 10-year period, with a mean (range) follow-up of 25.74 (6–120) months and a median (range) age of 70 (28–93) years. According to American Joint Committee on Cancer 8, the most common T category was T1a (64%), followed by T1b (18%) and T2a (8%). Of the 222 specimens, 183 (82.43%), 17 (7.66%), 19 (8.56%) and 3 (1.35%) were staged as IA, IB, IIA and IIB, respectively. The most common histological subtype was nodular in IA category and infiltrative in categories IB and IIA. Histologically, low-risk basal cell carcinomas were related to lower American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (IA), whereas high-risk basal cell carcinomas were related to American Joint Committee on Cancer stages IB and IIA (p < 0.001). No significant relation was found between T categorisation and risk stratification when adopting American Joint Committee on Cancer 7. Conclusion: American Joint Committee on Cancer 8 staging system is strongly related to primary eyelid basal cell carcinoma histological risk classification.

[1]  M. Tetzlaff,et al.  Validation Study of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, Staging System for Eyelid and Periocular Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2019, JAMA ophthalmology.

[2]  C. Proby,et al.  The new 8th edition of TNM staging and its implications for skin cancer: a review by the British Association of Dermatologists and the Royal College of Pathologists, U.K. , 2018, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  F. Clavel-Chapelon,et al.  Patterns of Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Skin Cancer Risk: the E3N-SunExp Study , 2017, Journal of epidemiology.

[4]  C. Proby,et al.  The new 8th edition of TNM staging and its implications for skin cancer: a review by the British Association of Dermatologists and the Royal College of Pathologists, United Kingdom , 2018 .

[5]  J. Brierley,et al.  Carcinoma of Skin of the Eyelid , 2017 .

[6]  Vivian T. Yin,et al.  Eyelid and ocular surface carcinoma: diagnosis and management. , 2015, Clinics in dermatology.

[7]  M. Bamford,et al.  5 Years review of periocular basal cell carcinoma and proposed follow-up protocol , 2013, Eye.

[8]  J. Leonardi-Bee,et al.  A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer , 2012, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  L. Sobin,et al.  Carcinoma of Skin of Eyelid , 2010 .

[10]  Martin A Weinstock,et al.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer mortality (1988-2000): the Rhode Island follow-back study. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[11]  K. Whitehead,et al.  Management of Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma With Modified En Face Frozen Section Controlled Excision , 2002, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  J. Cooper Ajcc Cancer Staging Manual , 1997 .

[13]  Martin A. Weinstock,et al.  Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Mortality , 1996 .