Adaptive Fusion Based Hybrid Denoising Method for Texture Images

This paper presents an efficient image denoising method by adaptively combining the features of wavelets and wave atom transforms. These transforms will be applied separately on the smooth areas of the image and the texture part of the image. The disintegration of the homogenous and nonhomogenous regions of noisy image is done by decomposing the noisy image into a noisy cartoon (smooth) image and a noisy texture image. Wavelets are good at denoising the smooth regions in an image and will be used to denoise the noisy cartoon image. Wave atoms better preserve the texture in an image hence is used to denoise the noisy texture image. The two images will be fused adaptively. For adaptive fusion different weights will be chosen for different areas in the image. Areas containing higher degree of texture will be allotted more weight, while the smoother regions will be weighed lightly. The information regarding the weights selection will be obtained from the variance map of the denoised texture image. Experimental results on standard test images provide better denoising results in terms of PSNR, SSIM, FOM and UQI. Texture is efficiently preserved and no unpleasant artifacts are observed.

[1]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Context adaptive image denoising through modeling of curvelet domain statistics , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[2]  R. S. Anand,et al.  PSO-based learning of sub-band adaptive thresholding function for image denoising , 2012, Signal Image Video Process..

[3]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  Image denoising in the wavelet domain using a new adaptive thresholding function , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Sparse geometric image representations with bandelets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  On the Role of Sparse and Redundant Representations in Image Processing , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  D. D.-Y. Po,et al.  Directional multiscale modeling of images using the contourlet transform , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  D. Donoho Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges , 1999 .

[10]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Estimating the probability of the presence of a signal of interest in multiresolution single- and multiband image denoising , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Information-theoretic analysis of interscale and intrascale dependencies between image wavelet coefficients , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  L. Demanet,et al.  Wave atoms and sparsity of oscillatory patterns , 2007 .

[13]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[14]  R. S. Anand,et al.  Edge preserved image enhancement using adaptive fusion of images denoised by wavelet and curvelet transform , 2011, Digit. Signal Process..

[15]  Jyoti Singhai,et al.  A Multilevel Shrinkage Approach for Curvelet Denoising , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.