Involved in Praxis and Analytical at a Distance

Lately, society has pressed for more direct societal relevance of social research. The argument of this special issue is that engaged research is an answer to the demand for a social science that matters. We define engaged research as a praxis where researchers actively engage in a social field in the pursuit of solving important local problems, while at the same time combining this with a scientific knowledge generation process. In other words, we discuss the conditions for research when researchers “go native” to solve problems and reflect along with participants. We have been able to find several sources of arguments supporting such a research strategy, but our search for methodological guidance on how to act as an engaged researcher has been in vain. What does it take for a researcher to do engaged research? The set of articles in this special issue all address certain aspects of this challenge. Some discuss the researcher’s path towards deep field engagement, whereas others discover various challenges and skills involved in engagement, and the task of developing scientific knowledge based on engaged research.

[1]  Edith Stein,et al.  On the problem of empathy , 1964 .

[2]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[3]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[4]  G. Mead.  The Social Self. , 2011, Psychiatry.

[5]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[6]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Politics of field research : sociology beyond enlightenment , 1991 .

[7]  D. Greenwood.  Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges , 2002 .

[8]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reason and the rationalization of society , 1984 .

[9]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[10]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[11]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[12]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[13]  David Kaplan,et al.  The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences , 2004 .

[14]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Insider/outsider team research , 1996 .

[15]  M. El-den,et al.  Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1993 .

[16]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .

[17]  Morten Levin.  Action research and the research community , 2003 .

[18]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[19]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research , 2007 .

[20]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[21]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  Fourth generation evaluation Sage. , 1993 .

[22]  Investigating subjectivity : research on lived experience , 1992 .

[23]  J. Galtung.  Theory and methods of social research , 1969 .

[24]  John Forester,et al.  The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes , 1999 .

[25]  C. P. Snow.  Corridors of Power , 1964 .

[26]  Ivana Marková,et al.  The dynamics of dialogue , 1990 .

[27]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[28]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change , 1998 .

[29]  W. Whyte,et al.  Learning from the field : innovating China's higher education system , 2008 .

[30]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[31]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .