Multiscale brain-machine interface decoders

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) have vastly used a single scale of neural activity, e.g., spikes or electrocorticography (ECoG), as their control signal. New technology allows for simultaneous recording of multiple scales of neural activity, from spikes to local field potentials (LFP) and ECoG. These advances introduce the new challenge of modeling and decoding multiple scales of neural activity jointly. Such multi-scale decoding is challenging for two reasons. First, spikes are discrete-valued and ECoG/LFP are continuous-valued, resulting in fundamental differences in statistical characteristics. Second, the time-scales of these signals are different, with spikes having a millisecond time-scale and ECoG/LFP having much slower time-scales on the order of tens of milliseconds. Here we develop a new multiscale modeling and decoding framework that addresses these challenges. Our multiscale decoder extracts information from ECoG/LFP in addition to spikes, while operating at the fast time-scale of the spikes. The multiscale decoder specializes to a Kalman filter (KF) or to a point process filter (PPF) when no spikes or ECoG/LFP are available, respectively. Using closed-loop BMI simulations, we show that compared to PPF decoding of spikes alone or KF decoding of LFP/ECoG alone, the multiscale decoder significantly improves the accuracy and error performance of BMI control and runs at the fast millisecond time-scale of the spikes. This new multiscale modeling and decoding framework has the potential to improve BMI control using simultaneous multiscale neural activity.

[1]  Kelvin So,et al.  Subject-specific modulation of local field potential spectral power during brain–machine interface control in primates , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Rapid control and feedback rates enhance neuroprosthetic control , 2017, Nature Communications.

[3]  Robin C. Ashmore,et al.  An Electrocorticographic Brain Interface in an Individual with Tetraplegia , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  G. W. Wornell,et al.  Feedback-Controlled Parallel Point Process Filter for Estimation of Goal-Directed Movements From Neural Signals , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  A High-Performance Neural Prosthesis Enabled by Control Algorithm Design , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Maryam Modir Shanechi,et al.  Optimal calibration of the learning rate in closed-loop adaptive brain-machine interfaces , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[7]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Stephen I. Ryu,et al.  Hybrid decoding of both spikes and low-frequency local field potentials for brain-machine interfaces , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  Robust Brain-Machine Interface Design Using Optimal Feedback Control Modeling and Adaptive Point Process Filtering , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Jose M. Carmena,et al.  High-performance brain-machine interface enabled by an adaptive optimal feedback-controlled point process decoder , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.