A survey of stakeholder perspectives on a proposed combined exoskeleton-wheelchair technology

Background: Exoskeleton technology has potential benefits for wheelchair users' health and mobility. However, there are practical barriers to their everyday use as a mobility device. In particular, challenges related to travelling longer distances and transitioning between using a wheelchair and exoskeleton walking may present significant deterrents to regular exoskeleton use. In an effort to remove these barriers, a combined exoskeleton-wheelchair concept ('COMBO') has been proposed, which aims to achieve the benefits of both these mobility technologies. Given the inherent importance of including user-stakeholder opinions when designing an assistive technology solution, a study was undertaken to explore the perspectives of wheelchair users and healthcare professionals on the proposed conceptual design of the COMBO. Methods: An online survey with quantitative and qualitative components was conducted with wheelchair users and healthcare professionals working directly with individuals with mobility impairments. Respondents rated whether they would use or recommend a COMBO for four potential reasons. Nine design features were rated and compared in terms of their importance. Content analysis was used to analyze data from an open-ended question regarding additional perceptions about using or recommending a COMBO. Results: A total of 481 survey responses were analyzed, 354 from wheelchair users and 127 from healthcare professionals. Potential health benefits was the most highly rated reason for potential use or recommendation of a COMBO. Of the 9 design features, 2 had a median rating of very important: inclusion of a fall-protection mechanism, and the ability for the operator to use their hands while standing. Qualitative findings indicated that health and physical benefits, use for daily life activities, and psychosocial benefits were important considerations in whether to use or recommend the COMBO. Conclusions: This study captures the opinions and perspectives of two stakeholder groups for an exoskeleton-wheelchair hybrid device. It also emphasizes the importance of fall-protection, hand-use capabilities and enabling functional activities. Findings from this study can be utilized to provide insight for the refinement of the COMBO concept, as well as to guide more general mobility device research and development.

[1]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Most essential wheeled mobility skills for daily life: an international survey among paralympic wheelchair athletes with spinal cord injury. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Framework for Assessment of the Usability of Lower-Extremity Robotic Exoskeletal Orthoses , 2015, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  Jose L Pons,et al.  Rehabilitation Exoskeletal Robotics , 2010, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[4]  Cordula Werner,et al.  Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[6]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  Atilla Kilicarslan,et al.  Real-Time Strap Pressure Sensor System for Powered Exoskeletons , 2015, Sensors.

[9]  Johanne Mattie,et al.  A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Scott R. Beach,et al.  Preferences and concerns for quality of life technology among older adults and persons with disabilities: National survey results , 2010 .

[11]  Joy Wee,et al.  Factors affecting measures of activities and participation in persons with mobility impairment , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  J. V. van Middendorp,et al.  Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  R. Major,et al.  The technique of reciprocal walking using the hip guidance orthosis (hgo) with crutches , 1984, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[14]  Jaimie F. Borisoff,et al.  Concept proposal for a detachable exoskeleton-wheelchair to improve mobility and health , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[15]  Daniel Fok,et al.  Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[16]  Julianna Arva,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Wheelchair Standing Devices , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  Katie Gant,et al.  Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  S Hesse,et al.  Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. , 2012, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  A. Hicks,et al.  Comparison of the effects of body-weight-supported treadmill training and tilt-table standing on spasticity in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury , 2011, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[20]  H. V. D. Loos,et al.  Exoskeletons as an Assistive Technology for Mobility and Manipulation , 2017 .

[21]  Scott Tanner,et al.  Update on Distance and Velocity Requirements for Community Ambulation , 2010, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[22]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  Engineering Better Wheelchairs to Enhance Community Participation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Hugh Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.