Overview of different hybrid vehicle architectures

Abstract The large boom in the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) market sector has seen the spread of three main powertrain configurations: Discontinuously Variable Transmission (DVT) parallel architectures, Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) parallel architectures and series architectures. In particular, CVT powertrains can count the highest number of sales in the HEV industry. In spite of this fact, in depth electrical losses analysis of this configuration and the introduction of more efficient electric component question the adoption of this powertrain as the model of energy efficiency. This paper aims to summarize the main results available in the scientific literature on this topic. It is firstly shown a fuel consumption comparison between the two parallel powertrains, secondly a brief description of the main electric component innovations is reported in order to fully understand the effects they have on the series architectures. Lastly, a fuel consumption comparison between the most efficient parallel solution and the series architecture is shown for the purpose of identifying the most efficient powertrain architecture.

[1]  Mario Marchesoni,et al.  Electrical-Loss Analysis of Power-Split Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2017 .

[2]  Mario Marchesoni,et al.  Advantages of Using Supercapacitors and Silicon Carbide on Hybrid Vehicle Series Architecture , 2017 .

[3]  Minjae Kim,et al.  Hybrid Thermostat Strategy for Enhancing Fuel Economy of Series Hybrid Intracity Bus , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Srdjan M. Lukic,et al.  Topological overview of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicular power system architectures and configurations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Xiaosong Hu,et al.  Comparison of Three Electrochemical Energy Buffers Applied to a Hybrid Bus Powertrain With Simultaneous Optimal Sizing and Energy Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Gianmario Pellegrino,et al.  Performance Comparison Between Surface-Mounted and Interior PM Motor Drives for Electric Vehicle Application , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Mario Marchesoni,et al.  Conceptual design upgrade on hybrid powertrains resulting from electric improvements , 2017 .

[8]  Huei Peng,et al.  Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[9]  Massimiliano Passalacqua,et al.  Energy comparison between different parallel hybrid vehicles architectures , 2017 .

[10]  Uwe Dieter Grebe,et al.  Differentiated analysis of downsizing concepts , 2008 .

[11]  Matteo Repetto,et al.  Turbocompound Technology On Hybrid Power Trains: Urban Buses Take Inspiration From F1 Power Units , 2016 .