On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Brian C J Moore,et al. Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Eric W Healy,et al. The effect of smoothing filter slope and spectral frequency on temporal speech information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .
[6] B. Moore,et al. Temporal and spectral masking release in low- and mid-frequency regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R. Patterson,et al. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] D P Phillips,et al. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The American journal of otology.
[10] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[11] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Brian C J Moore,et al. Testing the concept of a modulation filter bank: the audibility of component modulation and detection of phase change in three-component modulators. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Brian C J Moore,et al. The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Brian C J Moore,et al. High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Stuart Rosen,et al. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] M. Ericson,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] B. Moore,et al. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] T. Houtgast,et al. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] A. Cheveigné. Concurrent vowel identification. III. A neural model of harmonic interference cancellation , 1997 .
[23] T W Tillman,et al. Binaural maskin of speech by periodically modulated noise. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[24] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] Kohlrausch,et al. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Charles S. Watson,et al. Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .
[27] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[29] S. Shamma,et al. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] B. Moore,et al. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] T. Dau,et al. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Brian R Glasberg,et al. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.
[34] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Andrew J Oxenham,et al. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] T. Brand,et al. Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] G. Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[40] T. Houtgast. Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Joshua G W Bernstein,et al. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] B. Moore,et al. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] C. M. Marin,et al. Concurrent vowel identification II: Effects of phase, harmonicity and task , 1997 .
[46] T. Dau,et al. Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] R. Plomp. The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .
[49] Kamil K. Wójcicki,et al. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] B C Moore,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[51] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.