Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B A Williams,et al. A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[2] B. Hamilton,et al. Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3] L R Gollub,et al. Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] Barry Schwartz. Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[5] B. Schwartz,et al. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6] E. Wasserman. The effect of redundant contextual stimuli on autoshaping the pigeon’s keypeck , 1973 .
[7] G S REYNOLDS,et al. Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[8] R. J. Irwin,et al. Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[9] A. Catania,et al. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[10] E A Wasserman,et al. Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[11] R J HERRNSTEIN,et al. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] H. Rachlin. Contrast and Matching. , 1973 .
[13] J C Todorov,et al. Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[14] J. Staddon,et al. Contrast effects in maintained generalization gradients. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] K L Wheatley,et al. Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[16] Howard Rachlin,et al. Economic and biological influences on a pigeon's key peck. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[17] P Killeen,et al. A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[18] B. Schwartz,et al. Pavlovian Control Of Operant Behavior: An Analysis Of Autoshaping And Its Implications For Operant Conditioning , 1977 .
[19] K. Keller. The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[20] R L Menlove,et al. Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[21] P. L. Brown,et al. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[22] C. C. Perkins,et al. The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[23] F B Arnett,et al. A local-rate-of-response and interresponse-time analysis of behavioral contrast. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] J A Nevin,et al. An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[25] A. Catania,et al. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.