Choosing a sensible cut-off point: assessing the impact of uncertainty in a social network on the performance of NBDA

Network-based diffusion analysis (NBDA) has become a widely used tool to detect and quantify social learning in animal populations. NBDA infers social learning if the spread of a novel behavior follows the social network and hence relies on appropriate information on individuals’ network connections. Most studies on animal populations, however, lack a complete record of all associations, which creates uncertainty in the social network. To reduce this uncertainty, researchers often use a certain threshold of sightings for the inclusion of animals (which is often arbitrarily chosen), as observational error decreases with increasing numbers of observations. Dropping individuals with only few sightings, however, can lead to information loss in the network if connecting individuals are removed. Hence, there is a trade-off between including as many individuals as possible and having reliable data. We here provide a tool in R that assesses the sensitivity of NBDA to error in the social network given a certain threshold for the inclusion of individuals. It simulates a social learning process through a population and then tests the power of NBDA to reliably detect social learning after introducing observational error into the social network, which is repeated for different thresholds. Our tool can help researchers using NBDA to select a threshold, specific to their data set, that maximizes power to reliably quantify social learning in their study population.

[1]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Association indices for quantifying social relationships: how to deal with missing observations of individuals or groups , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Clint J. Perry,et al.  Associative Mechanisms Allow for Social Learning and Cultural Transmission of String Pulling in an Insect , 2016, PLoS biology.

[3]  D. Franks,et al.  Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  P. Richerson,et al.  Why Culture is Common, but Cultural Evolution is Rare , 1996 .

[5]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Estimating uncertainty and reliability of social network data using Bayesian inference , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[6]  Aoju Chen,et al.  Acquiring Complex Focus-Marking: Finnish 4- to 5-Year-Olds Use Prosody and Word Order in Interaction , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[7]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Detecting social transmission in networks. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  W. Hoppitt,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection with Network Based Diffusion Analysis , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[9]  L. Bejder,et al.  A method for testing association patterns of social animals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  A comparison of association indices , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Dorothy M. Fragaszy,et al.  On the relation between social dynamics and social learning , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Tara S. Stoinski,et al.  Evidence for social learning in wild lemurs (Lemur catta) , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[14]  Wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons) use social information to learn new foraging techniques , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[15]  David Lusseau,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty into the study of animal social networks , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Glenna F. Nightingale,et al.  Perching but not foraging networks predict the spread of novel foraging skills in starlings , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  The consequences of unidentifiable individuals for the analysis of an animal social network , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  W. Hoppitt,et al.  Social Network Analysis Shows Direct Evidence for Social Transmission of Tool Use in Wild Chimpanzees , 2014, PLoS biology.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  Charles L Nunn,et al.  Network-based diffusion analysis: a new method for detecting social learning , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Will Hoppitt,et al.  The conceptual foundations of network-based diffusion analysis: choosing networks and interpreting results , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[24]  Kai Jiang,et al.  PI(4)P Promotes Phosphorylation and Conformational Change of Smoothened through Interaction with Its C-terminal Tail , 2016, PLoS biology.

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[26]  Luke Rendell,et al.  Network-Based Diffusion Analysis Reveals Cultural Transmission of Lobtail Feeding in Humpback Whales , 2013, Science.

[27]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe , 2013 .