The COVID-19 Pandemic: Web 2.0 Tools as an Alternative Instruction for Science in Secondary Schools

COVID-19 pandemic had caused an unprecedented impact on teachers and students in their teaching and learning process. Diverse teaching and learning tools are essential to ensure that education continues. This confinement provides an opportunity to enculture a new norm for learning among Malaysian students and teachers. Usage of web 2.0 tools has indirectly encouraged students to study on their own and communicate dynamically with peers and teachers during online lessons. A mixed-method quasi-experimental study involving pre-test and post-test was conducted to investigate the impact of using web 2.0 tools on students’ achievement. 60 Form Two students were divided into control and experimental groups where the experimental group had lessons using The Product, Process, Person, and Press model of creative approach with web 2.0 tools while the control group was taught using the teacher-centered instruction. The creative approach using web 2.0 tools has not only produced advancement in students’ achievement in the science subject but has also motivated them to complete the assessments given during online lessons. The findings also emanated that students’ motivation to learn science through online learning was due to the usage of 2.0 tools. Hence, science teachers ought to be better prepared with the skills as well as better-designed learning modules and experiences to incorporate integrated online learning and face-to-face class with a blended learning approach seamlessly.

[1]  H. Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of 4Ps Creativity Teaching for College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017 .

[2]  Horng-Ji Lai,et al.  Examining civil servants’ decisions to use Web 2.0 tools for learning, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[3]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice , 2016, Connect. Sci..

[4]  Nesli Kala,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PREDICT–OBSERVE–EXPLAIN TECHNIQUE IN PROBING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING ABOUT ACID–BASE CHEMISTRY: A CASE FOR THE CONCEPTS OF pH, pOH, AND STRENGTH , 2013 .

[5]  R. Coll,et al.  Thai Grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions for acid–base chemistry , 2010 .

[6]  June Abbas,et al.  Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective , 2010 .

[7]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Experienced Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Teaching Acid–base Chemistry , 2008 .

[8]  Mei-Hung Chiu,et al.  A National Survey of Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry in Taiwan , 2007 .

[9]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  WISE design for knowledge integration , 2003 .

[10]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A protocol analysis of the influence of technology on students' actions, verbal commentary, and thought processes during the performance of acid‐base titrations , 1993 .

[11]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Student Achievement and Science Curriculum Development Using a Constructive Framework , 1991 .

[12]  Roger Amouroux,et al.  Conceptions of first-year university students of the constituents of matter and the notions of acids and bases , 1986 .