A REVIEW OF TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS IN BRITAIN

EARLY in 1966 I circulated my colleagues in Britain asking for details of their experience of toxic epidermal necrolysis (T.E.N.) and it is thanks to their generotis response that I am able to summarize the main feattires of 128 cases today, among which are included my four original ones. T.E.N. appears to be a pattern of cutaneous reaction. In 30 cases staphylococcal infection seemed the j^redominant feature, in 36 cases drugs, in 28 cases there co-existed a miscellany of diseases, and in 34 cases there was no cltte as to the cause. Sex.—There was a preponderance of females evident in all groups, of about 3 to 2, (Table I).

[1]  J. Jefferson Lyell's toxic epidermal necrolysis: a staphylococcal aetiology? , 1967, British medical journal.

[2]  R. Peachey,et al.  TOXIC EPIDERMAL NECROLYSIS AND MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA , 1967, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  W. P. Sweetnam,et al.  Intrapartum Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis , 1964, Archives of disease in childhood.

[4]  J. Overton Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated phenylbutazone therapy. , 1962, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  C. Evans Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis , 1959 .

[6]  J. Catto Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Occurring in a Child , 1959, British medical journal.