Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block

Objective: To test prospectively depolarisation and repolarisation body surface maps (BSMs) for mirror image reversal, which is less susceptible to artefact, in patients with acute ischaemic-type chest pain, and to compare these BSM criteria with previously published 12 lead ECG criteria Methods: An 80 lead portable BSM system was used to map patients presenting with acute ischaemic-type chest pain and a 12 lead ECG with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was defined by serial cardiac enzymes. Each 12 lead ECG was assessed by the criteria of Sgarbossa et al and Hands et al for diagnosis of AMI. Depolarisation and repolarisation BSMs were assessed for loss of mirror image reversal of QRS with ST-T isointegral map patterns and a change in vector angle from QRS to ST-T outside 180±15°—findings typically seen in LBBB with AMI. Results: Of 56 patients with chest pain and LBBB, 18 had enzymatically confirmed AMI. Patients with loss of BSM image reversal were significantly more likely to have AMI (odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 16.4, p = 0.007). Loss of BSM image reversal was significantly more sensitive (67%) for AMI than either 12 lead ECG method (17%, 33%) albeit with some loss in specificity (BSM 71%, 12 lead ECG 87%, 97%). Patients with AMI compared with those without AMI had a greater mean change in vector angle outside the normal range (180±15°), particularly between QRS isointegral and ST60 isopotential (the potential 60 ms after the J point at each electrode site) BSMs (19° v 9°, p = 0.038). Loss of image reversal and QRS-ST60 vector change outside 180±15° had 61% sensitivity and 82% specificity for AMI (odds ratio 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 24.4, p = 0.001). Conclusions: BSM compared with the 12 lead ECG improved the early diagnosis of AMI in the presence of LBBB.

[1]  E. Cook,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of complete left bundle branch block. , 1988, American heart journal.

[2]  I. Menown,et al.  Early diagnosis of right ventricular or posterior infarction associated with inferior wall left ventricular acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  C. Fry,et al.  Science of urinary incontinence Report of a Meeting of Physicians and Scientists, University College London , 1994, The Lancet.

[4]  E. Braunwald Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  M. Krucoff,et al.  Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy. , 1996, Circulation.

[6]  J. Ornato,et al.  Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. , 1998, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  F. Wackers The diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block. , 1987, Cardiology clinics.

[8]  I.B.A Menown,et al.  Body-surface map models for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 1998 .

[9]  M Hirai,et al.  The ability of QRST isointegral maps to detect myocardial infarction in the presence of simulated left bundle branch block. , 1993, European heart journal.

[10]  M. Dellborg,et al.  Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic left bundle-branch block. Standard 12-lead ECG compared to dynamic vectorcardiography. , 1999, Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal.

[11]  J. Ornato,et al.  Bundle-Branch Block and In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  J. Madias,et al.  A Critique of the new ST‐segment criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle‐branch block , 2001, Clinical cardiology.

[13]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Comparative study of QRST values from body surface potential mapping, 12-lead ECGs, VCGs in detecting inferior myocardial infarction, and evaluating the severity of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in simulated left bundle branch block. , 1993, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  Johan Herlitz,et al.  Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction : collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994 .

[15]  D. Baudendistel Heart Disease A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1993 .

[16]  A. Go,et al.  Should the electrocardiogram be used to guide therapy for patients with left bundle-branch block and suspected myocardial infarction? , 1999, JAMA.

[17]  Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' Collaborative Group Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients , 1994, The Lancet.

[18]  D Stilli,et al.  Body surface maps in left bundle branch block uncomplicated or complicated by myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy or myocardial ischemia. , 1987, Journal of electrocardiology.

[19]  G S Wagner,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Richard J. Jones Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1980 .