Improving the structural robustness of multi-story steel-frame buildings

Although there are numerous hazards that could trigger the progressive collapse of a building, there are limited provisions in related codes regarding the design of structures to withstand exposure to such threats. It is thus expedient to limit the extent of damage to prevent the initiation of progressive collapse. This could be done by usage of the alternate path method, whereby the structure is made to withstand the loss of one or more critical load-bearing elements and prevent disproportionate collapse. In our study, we investigated the resistance of seismically designed steel-frame buildings to progressive collapse, focusing on the contributions of the floor system and beam-to-column connections. The applied element method was used to predict the structural response by nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, with the purpose of determining some robustness criteria, using as reference the ratio of the failure load to the nominal gravity load.

[1]  Norman J. Glover The Oklahoma City Bombing: Improving Building Performance through Multi-Hazard Mitigation (FEMA 277) by Building Performance Analysis Team , 1997 .

[2]  Adrian Ciutina,et al.  Influence of steel-concrete interaction in dissipative zones of frames: I − Experimental study , 2013 .

[3]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part II: Application , 2008 .

[4]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Computational Simulation of Gravity-Induced Progressive Collapse of Steel-Frame Buildings: Current Trends and Future Research Needs , 2014 .

[5]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[6]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Experimental tests of different types of bolted steel beam–column joints under a central-column-removal scenario , 2013 .

[7]  Progressive collapse resistance of steel-concrete composite floors , 2010 .

[8]  Min Yu,et al.  The influence of joints and composite floor slabs on effective tying of steel structures in preventing progressive collapse , 2010 .

[9]  Adrian Ciutina,et al.  Robustness performance of seismic resistant building frames under abnormal loads , 2010 .

[10]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis , 2011 .

[11]  Eric B. Williamson,et al.  Static Equivalency in Progressive Collapse Alternate Path Analysis: Reducing Conservatism While Retaining Structural Integrity , 2006 .

[12]  David A. Nethercot,et al.  Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss — Part I: Simplified assessment framework , 2008 .

[13]  Yasser Alashker,et al.  A design-oriented model for the collapse resistance of composite floors subjected to column loss , 2011 .

[14]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Urban Habitat Constructions Under Catastrophic Events : COST C26 Action Final Report , 2010 .

[15]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Robustness of Composite Floor Systems with Shear Connections : Modeling, Simulation, and Evaluation , 2008 .

[16]  M. Holicky,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1990 : Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design , 2002 .

[17]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .