Daily chlorohexidine gluconate bathing with impregnated cloths results in statistically significant reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections.

BACKGROUND Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) contribute to increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and excessive cost of care. METHODS This study was an observational cohort study using historical controls in the setting of a 9-bed surgical intensive care unit in a Level I trauma center; all patients admitted or transferred into the unit were enrolled in the study. OBJECTIVES A quality improvement intervention protocol was instituted to reduce CLABSI incidence with a 3-month effectiveness study using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloths for daily patient bathing; education of surgical intensive care unit staff on changes to CLABSI prevention protocol and all existing CLABSI prevention policies and bundles already in place; and compliance monitoring and documentation. RESULTS The 3-month effectiveness study showed a decrease in CLABSI rates from 12.07 CLABSIs per 1000 central line-days to 3.17 CLABSIs per 1000 central line-days (73.7% rate reduction; P = .0358). CONCLUSION CLABSI incidence rates were reduced in a high-risk patient population using evidence-based prevention bundles and implementing daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate nonrinse cloths.

[1]  S. Saint,et al.  Strategies to Prevent Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Acute Care Hospitals , 2008, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[3]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. , 1994, JAMA.

[4]  Debra Johnson,et al.  Patients' bath basins as potential sources of infection: a multicenter sampling study. , 2009, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[5]  M. Zellinger,et al.  Daily Bathing with Chlorhexidine in the ICu to Prevent Central Line – Associated Bloodstream Infections , 2022 .

[6]  Sanjay Saint,et al.  Use of maximal sterile barriers during central venous catheter insertion: clinical and economic outcomes. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[7]  C. Hollenbeak,et al.  Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[8]  D. Cardo,et al.  Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002 , 2007, Public health reports.

[9]  Deborah Braccia,et al.  Systematic review of economic analyses of health care-associated infections. , 2005, American journal of infection control.

[10]  William E Trick,et al.  Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  R. D. McCormick,et al.  Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections , 2002, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  D. Pittet,et al.  Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. , 1994, JAMA.

[13]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  J. Edwards,et al.  National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. , 2008, American Journal of Infection Control.