Display density influences visual search for conjunctions of movement and orientation.

J. Driver and P. McLeod (1992) reported that the ease of visual search for targets defined by a conjunction of movement and orientation was affected by an interaction between target movement and target-nontarget discriminability. When the orientation discrimination to distinguish target from nontarget was difficult, stationary targets were easier to find than moving targets. But when the orientation discrimination to distinguish target from nontarget was easy, moving targets were easier to find than stationary targets. H. J. Muller and J. Maxwell (1994) repeated the experiment but failed to find the interaction. The authors show that the difference between these results was due to the density of the visual displays used. With a high-density display, the authors replicate Driver and McLeod's result; with a low-density display, they replicate Muller and Maxwell's result.

[1]  P. McLeod,et al.  Filtering and physiology in visual search: A convergence of behavioural and neurophysiological measures. , 1993 .

[2]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  H. Müller,et al.  Perceptual integration of motion and form information: is the movement filter involved in form discrimination? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[6]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  P. McLeod,et al.  Filtering by movement in visual search. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  D. Tolhurst Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Receptive-field properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area (MT) of owl monkeys. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Müller,et al.  Visual search for conjunctions of motion and form: display density and asymmetry reversal. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  P. McLeod,et al.  Reversing visual search asymmetries with conjunctions of movement and orientation , 1992 .

[14]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .