Stem and root assessment in mangrove forests using a low-cost, rapid-scan terrestrial laser scanner

Accurate assessment of forest structure and biomass is hampered by extensive field measurements that are time-consuming, costly, and inefficient. This is especially true in mangrove forests that have developed complex above-ground root structures for stability and survival in the harsh, anaerobic, and reducing conditions of water-logged sediments. These diverse structures can differ even among similar species, providing complex three dimensional structures and making them difficult to accurately assess using traditional allometric methods. Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) have been used widely in collecting forest inventory information in recent years, mainly due to their fine-scale, detailed spatial measurements and rapid sampling. In this work we detected stems and roots in TLS data from three mangrove forests on Pohnpei Island in Micronesia using 3D classification techniques. After removing noise from the point cloud, the training set was acquired by filtering the facets of the point cloud based on angular orientation. However, many mangrove trees contain above-ground roots, which can incorrectly be classified as stems. We consequently trained a supporting classifier on the roots to detect omitted root returns (i.e., those classified as stems). Consistency was assessed by comparing TLS results to concurrent field measurements made in the same plots. The accuracy and precision for TLS stem classification was 82% and 77%, respectively. The same values for TLS root detection were 76% and 68%. Finally, we simulated the stems using alpha shapes for volume estimation. The average consistency of the TLS volume assessment was 85%. This was obtained by comparing the plot-level mean stem volume (m3/ha) between field and TLS data. Additionally, field-measured diameter-at-breast-heights (DBH) were compared to the lidar-derived DBH using the reconstructed stems, resulting in 74% average accuracy and an RMSE of 7.52 cm. This approach can be used for automatic structural evaluation, and could contribute to more accurate biomass assessment of complex mangrove forest environments as part of forest inventories or carbon stock assessments.

[1]  M. Stephens.  EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[2]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching , 1975, CACM.

[3]  David G. Kirkpatrick,et al.  On the shape of a set of points in the plane , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  B. Clough,et al.  Allometric relationships for estimating above-ground biomass in six mangrove species , 1989 .

[5]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  Method for registration of 3-D shapes , 1992, Other Conferences.

[6]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  J A Sethian,et al.  A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  E. Mougin,et al.  Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana , 1998, Oecologia.

[9]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[10]  K. Ewel,et al.  Structure of mangrove trees and forests in Micronesia , 1999 .

[11]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[12]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of stems for assessment of taper, sweep and lean based on laser scanning of standing trees , 2004 .

[13]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[14]  P. Saenger,et al.  Pantropical trends in mangrove above-ground biomass and annual litterfall , 1993, Oecologia.

[15]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Assessing forest metrics with a ground-based scanning lidar , 2004 .

[16]  Aarne Halme,et al.  3-D mapping of natural environments with trees by means of mobile perception , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  I. Jonckheere,et al.  Influence of measurement set-up of ground-based LiDAR for derivation of tree structure , 2006 .

[18]  K. Tansey,et al.  Restoration Ecology of Lowland Tropical Peatlands in Southeast Asia: Current Knowledge and Future Research Directions , 2009, Ecosystems.

[19]  A. Komiyama,et al.  Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: A review , 2008 .

[20]  Nico Blodow,et al.  Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  The structural and radiative consistency of three-dimensional tree reconstructions from terrestrial lidar , 2009 .

[22]  D. Cahoon,et al.  Surface Elevation Change and Susceptibility of Different Mangrove Zones to Sea-Level Rise on Pacific High Islands of Micronesia , 2010, Ecosystems.

[23]  Sarah Smith-Voysey,et al.  Integrating building footprints and LiDAR elevation data to classify roof structures and visualise buildings , 2009, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.

[24]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar , 2011 .

[25]  Tianli Yu,et al.  Kernelized structural SVM learning for supervised object segmentation , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[26]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  An architectural model of trees to estimate forest structural attributes using terrestrial LiDAR , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Roman Shapovalov,et al.  Cutting-Plane Training of Non-associative Markov Network for 3D Point Cloud Segmentation , 2011, 2011 International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission.

[28]  S. Delagrange,et al.  Reconstruction and analysis of a deciduous sapling using digital photographs or terrestrial-LiDAR technology. , 2011, Annals of botany.

[29]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Detecting Changes in Forest Structure over Time with Bi-Temporal Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data , 2012, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[30]  A. Abd-Elrahman,et al.  Accuracy Evaluation of Terrestrial LIDAR and Multibeam Sonar Systems Mounted on a Survey Vessel , 2012 .

[31]  P. Adler,et al.  VOXEL-BASED APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING URBAN TREE VOLUME FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING DATA , 2012 .

[32]  Sebastian Wuttke,et al.  Reduction of training costs using active classification in fused hyperspectral and LiDAR data , 2012, Remote Sensing.

[33]  N. Duke.  Mangrove Floristics and Biogeography , 2013 .

[34]  N. Coops,et al.  Prediction of Wood Fiber Attributes from LiDAR-Derived Forest Canopy Indicators , 2013 .

[35]  S. Wdowinski,et al.  Assessing Mangrove Above-Ground Biomass and Structure using Terrestrial Laser Scanning: A Case Study in the Everglades National Park , 2014, Wetlands.

[36]  Wenkai Li,et al.  A New Accuracy Assessment Method for One-Class Remote Sensing Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  Alexander Bucksch,et al.  Breast Height Diameter Estimation From High-Density Airborne LiDAR Data , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[38]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Forest stand delineation from lidar point-clouds using local maxima of the crown height model and region merging of the corresponding Voronoi cells , 2014 .

[39]  J. Féret,et al.  Extended biomass allometric equations for large mangrove trees from terrestrial LiDAR data , 2016, Trees.

[40]  Jan van Aardt,et al.  Single-Scan Stem Reconstruction Using Low-Resolution Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[41]  G. Asner,et al.  A terrestrial lidar assessment of climate change impacts on forest structure , 2016 .

[42]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  Facets : a Cloudcompare Plugin to Extract Geological Planes from Unstructured 3d Point Clouds , 2016 .

[43]  Jan van Aardt,et al.  Marker-Free Registration of Forest Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data Pairs With Embedded Confidence Metrics , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[44]  Jonathan Li,et al.  Pairwise registration of TLS point clouds using covariance descriptors and a non-cooperative game , 2017 .

[45]  Ze He,et al.  Estimating Leaf Area Density of Individual Trees Using the Point Cloud Segmentation of Terrestrial LiDAR Data and a Voxel-Based Model , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[46]  Anthony G. Vorster,et al.  Non-destructive aboveground biomass estimation of coniferous trees using terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[47]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Variability and bias in active and passive ground-based measurements of effective plant, wood and leaf area index , 2018 .

[48]  C. Schaaf,et al.  Bounding uncertainty in volumetric geometric models for terrestrial lidar observations of ecosystems , 2018, Interface Focus.

[49]  Jan van Aardt,et al.  A Density-Based Approach for Leaf Area Index Assessment in a Complex Forest Environment Using a Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[50]  Alex Fafard,et al.  Weighted Spherical Sampling of Point Clouds for Forested Scenes , 2020 .