Dosimetric impact of interobserver variability in MRI-based delineation for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND To study the dosimetric impact of interobserver delineation variability (IODV) in MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS MR images of six patients were distributed to 10 experienced observers worldwide. They were asked to delineate the target volumes and the organs at risk (OARs) for each patient. Two types of reference contours were created (Expert Consensus - EC and Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation - STAPLE). Optimised plans based on both EC- and STAPLE-contours were prepared. These plans were transferred to each of the observer contour sets and the resulting DVH parameters (D(90) and D(2cc)) were calculated. For each patient the standard deviation (SD) for the 10 observers was calculated. RESULTS A mean relative SD of 8-10% was found for GTV and High Risk CTV (HR-CTV) D(90) analysing one single fraction. For rectum and bladder the mean relative SD for D(2cc) was 5-8% while sigmoid was at 11%. For the whole treatment the IODV in HR-CTV caused an uncertainty of ±5 Gy(α/β=10) (1SD). The corresponding figure for OARs was ±2-3 Gy(α/β=3). The results were not sensitive as to which structure set was used for the optimisation. CONCLUSIONS For the target volumes the dosimetric impact of IODV was smallest for the GTV and HR-CTV, while IODV had an even smaller impact on the bladder and rectum.

[1]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  FDG-PET-CT reduces the interobserver variability in rectal tumor delineation. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Contouring variability of the penile bulb on CT images: quantitative assessment using a generalized concordance index. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  From point A to the sculpted pear: MR image guidance significantly improves tumour dose and sparing of organs at risk in brachytherapy of cervical cancer. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Reconstruction of a ring applicator using CT imaging: impact of the reconstruction method and applicator orientation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Variation of treatment planning parameters (D90 HR-CTV, D 2cc for OAR) for cervical cancer tandem ring brachytherapy in a multicentre setting: comparison of standard planning and 3D image guided optimisation based on a joint protocol for dose-volume constraints. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Delineation of the postprostatectomy prostate bed using computed tomography: interobserver variability following the EORTC delineation guidelines. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  David Beyer,et al.  Interobserver variability leads to significant differences in quantifiers of prostate implant adequacy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  Prostate post-implant dosimetry: interobserver variability in seed localisation, contouring and fusion. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Local recurrences in cervical cancer patients in the setting of image-guided brachytherapy: A comparison of spatial dose distribution within a matched-pair analysis , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Inter-observer variability in contouring the penile bulb on CT images for prostate cancer treatment planning , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[15]  N Hodapp,et al.  [The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)]. , 2012, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[16]  Jasper Nijkamp,et al.  Interobserver variation of clinical target volume delineation in gastric cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Systematic evaluation of MRI findings in different stages of treatment of cervical cancer: potential of MRI on delineation of target, pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) , 2010 .

[19]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a 'Big Brother' evaluation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  W. Woodward,et al.  Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  C. Kirisits,et al.  PTV margins should not be used to compensate for uncertainties in 3D image guided intracavitary brachytherapy. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  C. Raaijmakers,et al.  Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Dose effect relationship for late side effects of the rectum and urinary bladder in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: a multi-institutional study. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver variation in HR-CTV contouring: intercomparison of transverse and paratransverse image orientation in 3D-MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  J. Dimopoulos,et al.  Dose-effect relationship for local control of cervical cancer by magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  Colleen A. Lawton Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer , 2012 .

[30]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Inter-observer comparison of target delineation for MRI-assisted cervical cancer brachytherapy: application of the GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  C. Kirisits,et al.  A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[34]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group: considerations and pitfalls in commissioning and applicator reconstruction in 3D image-based treatment planning of cervix cancer brachytherapy. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[35]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Consequences of random and systematic reconstruction uncertainties in 3D image based brachytherapy in cervical cancer. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[36]  MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy pre-planning, based on insertion of the applicator in para-cervical anaesthesia: preliminary results of a prospective study , 2009, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.