An improved memetic algorithm to enhance the sustainability and reliability of transport in container terminals

This paper improves our previous attempts in which we studied a combination of an evolutionary algorithm (EA) and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Results of those studies showed the process of sampling in MCS is very time consuming. This prevents the EA from producing an accurate estimation of the robust solutions within reasonable time. Thus the present work improves the performance of the EA to make it possible to reach high quality solutions in reasonable time, therefore yielding a number of more practical solutions in real cases. Firstly, it proposes a new sampling technique to generate samples that better reflect the worst-case scenarios. This helps the EA to find more robust solutions using smaller sample sizes. Secondly, it proposes a new adaptive sampling technique to adjust the sample size during evolution. Subsequently, to evaluate the proposed algorithm we tested it in a typical environment with shuttle transport tasks: container terminal. Experimental results show that such improvements led to a significantly improved performance of the EA, thus making the proposed algorithm perfectly usable for empirical cases.

[1]  Shengxiang Yang,et al.  Evolutionary dynamic optimization: A survey of the state of the art , 2012, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[2]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Kenneth Sörensen,et al.  A genetic algorithm for robust schedules in a one-machine environment with ready times and due dates , 2004, 4OR.

[4]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation for optimal plant design , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Kenneth Sörensen,et al.  A Practical Approach for Robust and Flexible Vehicle Routing Using Metaheuristics and Monte Carlo Sampling , 2009, J. Math. Model. Algorithms.

[6]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[7]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  Identifying the Robust Number of Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles in Container Terminals , 2014, EvoApplications.

[8]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Minimum Vehicle Fleet Size Under Time-Window Constraints at a Container Terminal , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Monte Carlo Simulation for the Optimization of System Design and Operation , 2007, Computational Intelligence in Reliability Engineering.

[10]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments-a survey , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Pyung-Hoi Koo,et al.  Fleet sizing and vehicle routing for container transportation in a static environment , 2004, OR Spectr..

[12]  A. Peirce Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 2010 .

[13]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  Determination of the number of automated guided vehicles required at a semi-automated container terminal , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  B. Farling,et al.  Analysis of automated guided vehicle configurations in flexible manufacturing systems , 2001 .

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Trung Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Continuous dynamic optimisation using evolutionary algorithms , 2011 .

[17]  Ferrante Neri,et al.  An adaptive prudent-daring evolutionary algorithm for noise handling in on-line PMSM drive design , 2007, 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.