Effect of friction stir processing tool probe on fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface

Abstract An investigation has been carried out of the effects of tool probe shape and size on the formation of surface composite by uniformly distributing SiC particles into a surface layer of an A1050-H24 aluminium plate through friction stir processing (FSP). Tool probes of three different diameters (3, 5 and 7 mm) and four different shapes (circular with threads, circular without threads, square and triangular) have been used to fabricate the surface layers at rotation speeds of 1500–2250 rev min−1 and a travelling speed of 1·66 mm s−1. The SiC particles were packed into a groove of 3 mm width and 1·5 mm depth cut on the aluminium plate and covered by an aluminium sheet of 2 mm thickness. A rotating tool was plunged into the plate through the cover sheet so that the tip of the probe reached beyond the bottom of the groove. As a result, it was found that the square probe dispersed the SiC particles homogeneously in the nugget zone compared with other probe shapes regardless of the rotation speeds. Furthermore, the distributed particles and also the aluminium matrix grain size became finer by the use of square probe than those of the other shapes. On the other hand, the wear rates of the square and triangular probes were higher than that of circular shape. The worn iron debris from the tool reacted with aluminium matrix and form fine iron aluminides compound dispersed in the nugget zone. The probe size had limited effects on the homogeneity of the SiC particles distribution in the nugget zone; the distribution of SiC particles obtained by triple FSP passes was less homogeneous when the probe size was smaller. Microhardness of the nugget zone was homogeneously increased to a level as high as 60 HV with tool of square probe shape after three passes to be compared with 23 HV of the aluminium matrix beside the nugget zone.

[1]  Sanbao Lin,et al.  The influence of pin geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir weld 2014 Al alloy , 2005 .

[2]  R. Nandan,et al.  Numerical simulation of three-dimensional heat transfer and plastic flow during friction stir welding , 2006 .

[3]  A. N. Attia Surface metal matrix composites , 2001 .

[4]  Z. Chen,et al.  On the forming mechanism of banded structures in aluminium alloy friction stir welds , 2008 .

[5]  K. N. Krishnan,et al.  On the formation of onion rings in friction stir welds , 2002 .

[6]  D. Miracle Metal matrix composites – From science to technological significance , 2005 .

[7]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Visualization of the material flow in AA2195 friction-stir welds using a marker insert technique , 2001 .

[8]  N. Ho,et al.  Al-Al3Ti nanocomposites produced in situ by friction stir processing , 2006 .

[9]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  Rajiv S. Mishra,et al.  Superplastic deformation behaviour of friction stir processed 7075Al alloy , 2002 .

[11]  P. Cavaliere,et al.  Superplastic behaviour of friction stir processed AZ91 magnesium alloy produced by high pressure die cast , 2007 .

[12]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Influences of tool pin profile and tool shoulder diameter on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy , 2008 .

[13]  N. Ho,et al.  Ultrafine-grained Al–Al2Cu composite produced in situ by friction stir processing , 2005 .

[14]  Hidetoshi Fujii,et al.  Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys , 2006 .

[15]  A. Gerlich,et al.  Material flow during friction stir spot welding , 2006 .

[16]  Rajiv S. Mishra,et al.  Friction Stir Processing: a Tool to Homogenize Nanocomposite Aluminum Alloys , 2001 .

[17]  S. Muthukumaran,et al.  Multi-layered metal flow and formation of onion rings in friction stir welds , 2008 .

[18]  Keiro Tokaji,et al.  Effect of tool geometry on microstructure and static strength in friction stir spot welded aluminium alloys , 2007 .

[19]  Paul A. Colegrove,et al.  Two-dimensional CFD modelling of flow round profiled FSW tooling , 2004 .

[20]  A. Reynolds Flow visualization and simulation in FSW , 2008 .

[21]  Paul A. Colegrove,et al.  3-Dimensional CFD modelling of flow round a threaded friction stir welding tool profile , 2005 .

[22]  Jesper Henri Hattel,et al.  An analytical model for the heat generation in friction stir welding , 2004 .

[23]  Y. Morisada,et al.  MWCNTs/AZ31 surface composites fabricated by friction stir processing , 2006 .

[24]  J. C. Huang,et al.  Mg based nano-composites fabricated by friction stir processing , 2006 .

[25]  H. Kokawa,et al.  Experimental simulation of recrystallized microstructure in friction stir welded Al alloy using a plane-strain compression test , 2008 .

[26]  H. Bhadeshia,et al.  Recent advances in friction-stir welding : Process, weldment structure and properties , 2008 .

[27]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Influences of tool pin profile and axial force on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy , 2008 .

[28]  Anthony P. Reynolds,et al.  Two-dimensional friction stir welding process model based on fluid mechanics , 2003 .

[29]  Rajiv S. Mishra,et al.  Friction Stir Welding and Processing , 2007 .

[30]  Essam R. I. Mahmoud,et al.  Fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface by friction stir processing , 2008 .

[31]  A. Kurt,et al.  The influence of stirrer geometry on bonding and mechanical properties in friction stir welding process , 2004 .

[32]  M. Mahoney,et al.  High strain rate superplasticity in friction stir processed Al–Mg–Zr alloy , 2003 .

[33]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Material behaviors and mechanical features in friction stir welding process , 2007 .

[34]  Paul A. Colegrove,et al.  Development of Trivex friction stir welding tool Part 2 – three-dimensional flow modelling , 2004 .

[35]  Mustafa Kemal Kulekci,et al.  Effects of tool rotation and pin diameter on fatigue properties of friction stir welded lap joints , 2008 .

[36]  Anthony P. Reynolds,et al.  Process response parameter relationships in aluminium alloy friction stir welds , 2007 .

[37]  M. N. James,et al.  Characterization of the influences of FSW tool geometry on welding forces and weld tensile strength using an instrumented tool , 2008 .

[38]  A. Scialpi,et al.  Influence of shoulder geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 6082 aluminium alloy , 2007 .

[39]  Z. Ma,et al.  Friction Stir Processing Technology: A Review , 2008 .

[40]  A. Mukherjee,et al.  High Strain Rate Superplasticity in a Friction Stir Processed 7075 Al Alloy , 1999 .

[41]  Jesper Henri Hattel,et al.  Thermal modelling of friction stir welding , 2008 .

[42]  W. M. Thomas,et al.  Friction Stir Welding Tools and Developments , 2003 .

[43]  A. Gerlich,et al.  Material flow and intermixing during dissimilar friction stir welding , 2008 .

[44]  G. Cui,et al.  Periodical plastic flow pattern in friction stir processed Al-Mg alloy , 2008 .

[45]  R. Mishra,et al.  Low temperature superplasticity in a friction-stir-processed ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg–Sc alloy , 2005 .

[46]  R. Mishra,et al.  Friction stir processing: a novel technique for fabrication of surface composite , 2003 .

[47]  Young Gon Kim,et al.  Improvement of mechanical properties of aluminum die casting alloy by multi-pass friction stir processing , 2006 .

[48]  N. Ho,et al.  Intermetallic-reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced in situ by friction stir processing , 2007 .

[49]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Influences of tool pin profile and welding speed on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy , 2008 .

[50]  R. Mishra,et al.  Effect of friction stir processing on the microstructure of cast A356 aluminum , 2006 .

[51]  Jesper Henri Hattel,et al.  Modelling heat flow around tool probe in friction stir welding , 2005 .

[52]  Jesper Henri Hattel,et al.  Material flow in butt friction stir welds in AA2024-T3 , 2006 .

[53]  S. Arepalli,et al.  Survivability of single-walled carbon nanotubes during friction stir processing , 2006 .

[54]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Influences of pin profile and rotational speed of the tool on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy , 2007 .

[55]  Philip J. Withers,et al.  Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083-AA6082. Part I: Process parameter effects on thermal history and weld properties , 2006 .

[56]  R. Dasgupta,et al.  SiC particulate dispersed composites of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy: Property comparison with parent alloy , 2005 .

[57]  Livan Fratini,et al.  Material flow in FSW of AA7075–T6 butt joints: Numerical simulations and experimental verifications , 2006 .

[58]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Processing and banding in AA2524 and AA2024 friction stir welding , 2007 .

[59]  Paul A. Colegrove,et al.  Development of Trivex friction stir welding tool Part 1 – two-dimensional flow modelling and experimental validation , 2004 .