Wireless 5G Radiofrequency Technology — An Overview of Small Cell Exposures, Standards and Science

5G small cell antenna systems are among the latest technologies that support wireless communications by the transmission of radiofrequency (RF) signals. Coded RF signals in the range of 0.6 to 47 GHz from fixed small cell antennas supplement wireless communications from 3G and 4G wireless systems. This paper describes the propagation of RF signals from a pole-mounted 5G antenna and how the signal strength declines with distance for a representative installation operating at 39 GHz. The far field exposure from the antenna is compared to those from multiple natural and man-made RF sources. In the United States, RF exposure standards are issued by the Federal Communications Commission. We review the history and derivation of these standards in relation to other national and international standard-setting bodies. Some have raised concern as to whether sufficient health and safety studies have been performed on RF from 5G systems, but the commonality of RF frequencies up to 300 GHz enables health agencies and standard-setting bodies to assess the potential for effects across this frequency spectrum. A 5G RF signal does not have a different mode of action than a lower frequency communication signal; both involve tissue heating at sufficient field strengths. The key difference for 5G frequencies above 6 GHz is that the body’s electrical properties better limit energy deposition to a shallow depth, largely confined to superficial layers of the skin. Research to date has not provided a reliable scientific basis to conclude that RF communication signals at 5G or other frequencies will cause or contribute to adverse health effects.

[1]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[2]  Ronald N Kostoff,et al.  ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G MOBILE NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY UNDER REAL-LIFE CONDITIONS. , 2020, Toxicology letters.

[3]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  T. Kubo,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields , 2008 .

[5]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz” , 2019, IEEE Access.

[6]  Melike Erol-Kantarci,et al.  A Survey on Recent Trends and Open Issues in Energy Efficiency of 5G , 2019, Sensors.

[7]  Ieee Standards Board IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz , 1992 .

[8]  ICNIRP NOTE ON RECENT ANIMAL CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES , 2018 .

[9]  Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). , 2020, Health physics.

[10]  Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields , 2020 .

[11]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  A Survey of Energy-Efficient Techniques for 5G Networks and Challenges Ahead , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  A. Poulsen Risk analysis of human exposure to electromagnetic fields , 2010 .

[13]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. , 2011, International journal of oncology.

[14]  M.C. Ziskin,et al.  Comar reports - comar technical information statement the IEEE exposure limits for radiofrequency and microwave energy , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[15]  Myrtill Simkó,et al.  5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects—A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.