Seismologic applications of GRACE time-variable gravity measurements

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) has been measuring temporal and spatial variations of mass redistribution within the Earth system since 2002. As large earthquakes cause significant mass changes on and under the Earth’s surface, GRACE provides a new means from space to observe mass redistribution due to earthquake deformations. GRACE serves as a good complement to other earthquake measurements because of its extensive spatial coverage and being free from terrestrial restriction. During its over 10 years mission, GRACE has successfully detected seismic gravitational changes of several giant earthquakes, which include the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake, 2010 Maule (Chile) earthquake, and 2011 Tohoku-Oki (Japan) earthquake. In this review, we describe by examples how to process GRACE time-variable gravity data to retrieve seismic signals, and summarize the results of recent studies that apply GRACE observations to detect co- and post-seismic signals and constrain fault slip models and viscous lithospheric structures. We also discuss major problems and give an outlook in this field of GRACE application.

[1]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[2]  C. Jekeli Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[3]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[4]  C. Bassin,et al.  The Current Limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America , 2000 .

[5]  M. Cheng,et al.  Variations in the Earth's oblateness during the past 28 years , 2004 .

[6]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Coseismic deformations detectable by satellite gravity missions: A case study of Alaska (1964, 2002) and Hokkaido (2003) earthquakes in the spectral domain , 2004 .

[7]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[8]  C. Shum,et al.  Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement , 2005 .

[9]  D. Chambers Evaluation of new GRACE time‐variable gravity data over the ocean , 2006 .

[10]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[11]  Chen Ji,et al.  Crustal Dilatation Observed by GRACE After the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2006, Science.

[12]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  PSGRN/PSCMP - a new code for calculating co- and post-seismic deformation, geoid and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  J. Kusche Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[14]  Kate Huihsuan Chen,et al.  Towards a universal rule on the recurrence interval scaling of repeating earthquakes? , 2007 .

[15]  Ernst J. O. Schrama,et al.  Signal and noise in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observed surface mass variations , 2007 .

[16]  Matthias Holschneider,et al.  Coseismic and post-seismic signatures of the Sumatra 2004 December and 2005 March earthquakes in GRACE satellite gravity , 2007 .

[17]  K. Heki,et al.  Slow postseismic recovery of geoid depression formed by the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman Earthquake by mantle water diffusion , 2007 .

[18]  M. Manga,et al.  Thermal demagnetization of Martian upper crust by magma intrusion , 2007 .

[19]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  GRACE detects coseismic and postseismic deformation from the Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2007 .

[20]  E. Schrama,et al.  Improved accuracy of GRACE gravity solutions through empirical orthogonal function filtering of spherical harmonics , 2007 .

[21]  M. Camp,et al.  Retrieving earthquake signature in grace gravity solutions , 2008 .

[22]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Spatiospectral localization of global geopotential fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) reveals the coseismic gravity change owing to the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2008 .

[23]  Chen Ji,et al.  Implications of postseismic gravity change following the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from the regional harmonic analysis of GRACE intersatellite tracking data , 2008 .

[24]  E. Boschi,et al.  Postseismic signature of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake on low-degree gravity harmonics , 2008 .

[25]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  The design of an optimal filter for monthly GRACE gravity models , 2008 .

[26]  Pavel Ditmar,et al.  Localized spectral analysis of global satellite gravity fields for recovering time-variable mass redistributions , 2008 .

[27]  Jürgen Kusche,et al.  Evaluation of GRACE filter tools from a hydrological perspective , 2009 .

[28]  Richard Biancale,et al.  Separation of coseismic and postseismic gravity changes for the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake from 4.6 yr of GRACE observations and modelling of the coseismic change by normal-modes summation , 2009 .

[29]  B. Chao,et al.  An effective filtering for GRACE time‐variable gravity: Fan filter , 2009 .

[30]  Wenke Sun,et al.  General formulations of global co-seismic deformations caused by an arbitrary dislocation in a spherically symmetric earth model-applicable to deformed earth surface and space-fixed point , 2009 .

[31]  C. Shum,et al.  Non-isotropic Gaussian smoothing and leakage reduction for determining mass changes over land and ocean using GRACE data , 2010 .

[32]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Regional gravity decrease after the 2010 Maule (Chile) earthquake indicates large‐scale mass redistribution , 2010 .

[33]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Time-variable gravity from space and present-day mass redistribution in theEarth system , 2010 .

[34]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  Gravity changes due to the Sumatra-Andaman and Nias earthquakes as detected by the GRACE satellites: a reexamination , 2010 .

[35]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Upper mantle rheology from GRACE and GPS postseismic deformation after the 2004 Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2010 .

[36]  Koji Matsuo,et al.  Coseismic gravity changes of the 2010 earthquake in central Chile from satellite gravimetry , 2010 .

[37]  G. Spada,et al.  A sea level equation for seismic perturbations , 2010 .

[38]  W. Wal,et al.  Ocean contribution to co-seismic crustal deformation and geoid anomalies: Application to the 2004 December 26 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake , 2011 .

[39]  重力卫星GRACE检测出2010年智利 M w 8.8地震的同震重力变化 , 2011 .

[40]  Coseismic gravity changes of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake from satellite gravimetry , 2011 .

[41]  R. Sabadini,et al.  GRACE gravity data help constraining seismic models of the 2004 Sumatran earthquake , 2011 .

[42]  Wenbin Shen,et al.  Investigation of the Co-seismic gravity field variations caused by the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake using monthly GRACE data , 2011 .

[43]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  Investigation on afterslip and steady state and transient rheology based on postseismic deformation and geoid change caused by the Sumatra 2004 earthquake , 2011 .

[44]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Viscous lithospheric structure beneath Sumatra inferred from post-seismic gravity changes detected by GRACE , 2011 .

[45]  Shin‐Chan Han,et al.  Contribution of satellite gravimetry to understanding seismic source processes of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake , 2011 .

[46]  GRACE detection of the medium- to far-field coseismic gravity changes caused by the 2004 MW9.3 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake , 2012 .

[47]  R. Sabadini,et al.  A source model for the great 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw=9.1) from inversion of GRACE gravity data , 2012 .

[48]  Chung-Yen Kuo,et al.  Coseismic slip of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Great Maule, Chile, earthquake quantified by the inversion of GRACE observations , 2012 .

[49]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Coseismic deflection change of the vertical caused by the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0) , 2012 .

[50]  C. Shum,et al.  Gravitational gradient changes following the 2004 December 26 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake inferred from GRACE , 2012 .

[51]  Wenke Sun,et al.  Geodetic observations detecting coseismic displacements and gravity changes caused by the Mw = 9.0 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake , 2012 .

[52]  S. Wu,et al.  Using a 3‐D spherical plasmoid to interpret the Sun‐to‐Earth propagation of the 4 November 1997 coronal mass ejection event , 2012 .

[53]  S. Bettadpur Insights into the Earth System mass variability from CSR-RL05 GRACE gravity fields , 2012 .

[54]  C. Shum,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake constrained by GRACE gravimetry , 2012 .

[55]  Jianlin Xia,et al.  Massively parallel structured multifrontal solver for time-harmonic elastic waves in 3-D anisotropic media , 2012 .

[56]  I. Panet,et al.  Numerical modelling of post-seismic rupture propagation after the Sumatra 26.12.2004 earthquake constrained by GRACE gravity data , 2013 .

[57]  Shin-Chan Han,et al.  Source parameter inversion for recent great earthquakes from a decade‐long observation of global gravity fields , 2013 .

[58]  G. Masters,et al.  Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust , 2013 .

[59]  P. Visser,et al.  Observing coseismic gravity change from the Japan Tohoku‐Oki 2011 earthquake with GOCE gravity gradiometry , 2013 .

[60]  R. Sabadini,et al.  Gravitational seismology retrieving Centroid‐Moment‐Tensor solution of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake , 2013 .