Demand side participation for frequency containment in the web of cells architecture

A large number of demand side management schemes have been proposed in literature for provision of frequency control ancillary services to the network. However, it is assumed that all the flexible devices within the network are managed and controlled under one demand side management (DSM) scheme. In this paper, two independent demand side management schemes control the portfolio of flexible devices within a web of cells architecture. A methodology and scenarios for analysis of the performance of more than one DSM scheme within the same network have been realized using a real-time power hardware-in-the-loop co-simulation platform, and the paper presents this as a basis for investigations of such arrangements.

[1]  Tyrone L. Vincent,et al.  Aggregate Flexibility of Thermostatically Controlled Loads , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  J. Driesen,et al.  Primary and Secondary Frequency Support by a Multi-Agent Demand Control System , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Sean P. Meyn,et al.  Ancillary Service to the Grid Through Control of Fans in Commercial Building HVAC Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Jacob Østergaard,et al.  Smart Demand for Frequency Regulation: Experimental Results , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  L. J. Giacoletto,et al.  Energy storage and conversion , 1965, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  G. Venekamp,et al.  Dynamic pricing by scalable energy management systems — Field experiences and simulation results using PowerMatcher , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[7]  W. M. Warwick,et al.  End-Use Load and Consumer Assessment Program: motivation and overview , 1993 .

[8]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Domestic electricity demand model - simulation example , 2010 .

[9]  Zhao Xu,et al.  Demand as Frequency Controlled Reserve , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  James R. McDonald,et al.  Architecture of a Network-in-the-Loop Environment for Characterizing AC Power-System Behavior , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Luciano MARTINI,et al.  ELECTRA IRP APPROACH TO VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY CONTROL FOR FUTURE POWER SYSTEMS WITH HIGH DER PENETRATION , 2015 .

[12]  Sean P. Meyn,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Frequency Regulation From Commercial Building HVAC Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  S. Ali Pourmousavi,et al.  Real-Time Central Demand Response for Primary Frequency Regulation in Microgrids , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  D.G. Infield,et al.  Stabilization of Grid Frequency Through Dynamic Demand Control , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Primary Control by ON/OFF Demand-Side Devices , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  Fred Schweppe,et al.  Homeostatic Utility Control , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[17]  François Bouffard,et al.  Decentralized Demand-Side Contribution to Primary Frequency Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  N. Lu,et al.  A state-queueing model of thermostatically controlled appliances , 2004 .