Accountability for environmental performance of the Australian Commonwealth public sector

Takes an exploratory approach to the development of an accountability framework for environmental performance of the Australian Commonwealth public sector. Explains that the aim of the environmental performance accountability framework is for the various stakeholders to understand the actions of Commonwealth public sector organizations and consequences of those actions for ecological systems; to become familiar with the trends and changes in trends in public sector environmental performance; and to place stakeholders in a position to promote change when performance is not acceptable. Examines three interrelated strands of literature. Identifies key institutional stakeholders in the Commonwealth public sector. Synthesizes the literature related to public sector transformation, and reviews the flourishing literature on environmental accounting and reporting, and links it to the concept of environmental accountability. Drawing on this literature, explores interrelationships between three characteristics of environmental performance at the federal level in the Australian public sector: criticality of natural capital; information uncertainty; and regulatory response. Examines environmental accountability dimensions of each of these characteristics. Concludes by making three policy recommendations: first, measurement of environmental performance should focus on criticality of natural capital and informational uncertainty as bounded by the precautionary principle; second, the measures of criticality of natural capital and informational uncertainty should determine the extent of direct accountability to parliament for each public sector organization’s environmental performance; and, finally, a third party attestation of reported information is needed. Also makes some suggestions for extending this exploratory research.

[1]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate social and environmental reporting , 1995 .

[2]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate , 1992 .

[3]  E. Barbier,et al.  Blueprint for a green economy , 1989 .

[4]  M. Mathews.  Twenty‐five years of social and environmental accounting research , 1997 .

[5]  C. Deegan,et al.  Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?: An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority , 1996 .

[6]  I. Thynne.  The Incorporated Company as an Instrument of Government: A Quest for a Comparative Understanding , 1994 .

[7]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Modes of regulation in advanced capitalism: Locating accountancy in four countries , 1987 .

[8]  Rhetoric and case study research: response to Joni Young and Alistair Preston and to Sue Llewellyn , 1996 .

[9]  Andrew Gamble,et al.  The Free Economy and the Strong State , 1988 .

[10]  J. Guthrie.  AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC BUSINESS ENTERPRISES: ANALYSIS OF CHANGING ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGIMES , 1993 .

[11]  Gwyn Prins,et al.  Politics and the environment , 1990 .

[12]  T. Tinker,et al.  Falling down the Hole in the Middle of the Road: Political Quietism in Corporate Social Reporting , 1991 .

[13]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Of manners gentle : enforcement strategies of Australian business regulatory agencies , 1986 .

[14]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Accounting for public accounts committees , 1996 .

[15]  Y. Ijiri.  On the accountability-based conceptual framework of accounting , 1983 .

[16]  R. Burritt,et al.  Australian Commonwealth Entities: An Analysis of Their Environmental Disclosures , 1997 .

[17]  C. Tilt.  The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate SocialDisclosure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1994 .

[18]  R. Eckersley.  Habermas and green political thought , 1990 .

[19]  Accountability and control : government officials and the exercise of power , 1987 .

[20]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Theories and Case Studies: Limitation or Liberation? , 1996 .

[21]  R. Hobbs.  Australia: State of the environment 1996 , 1997 .

[22]  James M. Buchanan,et al.  Freedom in Constitutional Contract: Perspectives of a Political Economist , 1979 .

[23]  E. Hey.  The precautionary principle , 1993 .

[24]  James Guthrie,et al.  Public sector accounting and the challenge of managerialism , 1990 .

[25]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate Reporting for Sustainable Development: Accounting for Sustainability in 2000AD1 , 1994, Environmental Values.

[26]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent“Alternative” Accounting Research , 1992 .

[27]  C. K. Lindblom.  The implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure , 1994 .

[28]  S. Evans,et al.  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND THE BRITISH ECONOMY IN THE 1990s: MRS THATCHER'S LEGACY , 1992 .

[29]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Environmental Disturbances and Organizational Transitions and Transformations: Some Alternative Models , 1991 .

[30]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Accounting for the Environment , 1993 .

[31]  Norman B. Macintosh,et al.  Management Accounting and Control Systems: Organisational and Behavioural Approach , 1995 .

[32]  G. M. Bates.  Environmental law in Australia , 1983 .

[33]  J. Guthrie,et al.  The greening of public sector annual reports: towards a benchmark , 1996 .

[34]  John Wanna,et al.  Public sector management in Australia , 1992 .

[35]  Dennis M. Patten.  INTRA-INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES IN RESPONSE TO THE ALASKAN OIL SPILL: A NOTE ON... , 1992 .

[36]  W. G. Tymon,et al.  Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences , 1982 .

[37]  David Solomons,et al.  Accounting and social change: A neutralist view , 1991 .

[38]  D. Owen.  Accounting and Accountability , 1995 .

[39]  Amalgams Which Involve Sporadic Simple Groups I , 1997 .

[40]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Accountability and Accountable Management in the UK Public Sector , 1993 .

[41]  J. Pallot.  Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting , 1992 .

[42]  R. Burritt,et al.  Accounting and Ecological Crisis , 1991 .

[43]  Corporate policy, values, and social responsibility , 1985 .

[44]  Guy Neave,et al.  Accountability and Control , 1980 .

[45]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle‐range” thinking , 1995 .

[46]  R. C. Earll.  Commonsense and the precautionary principle—An environmentalist's perspective , 1992 .

[47]  C. Deegan,et al.  The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports , 1997 .

[48]  Dennis M. Patten.  Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure , 1991 .

[49]  E. Papadakis.  Politics and the Environment: The Australian Experience , 1993 .

[50]  G. Benston.  Accounting and corporate accountability , 1982 .

[51]  S. Llewellyn.  Theories for theorists or theories for practice? Liberating academic accounting research? , 1996 .

[52]  D. C. Corbett,et al.  Australian Public Sector Management , 1996 .

[53]  A. Wildavsky.  Accounting for the environment , 1994 .

[54]  Geoffrey Brennan,et al.  The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. , 1987 .

[55]  H. Willmott,et al.  The mountains are still there: Accounting academics and the bearings of intellectuals , 1995 .

[56]  C. Stone,et al.  Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. , 1976 .

[57]  R. Gray.  ACCOUNTING AND ENVIRONMENTALISM: AN EXPLORATION OF THE CHALLENGE OF GENTLY ACCOUNTING FOR... , 1992 .

[58]  J. Guthrie.  Australian public sector accounting: transformations and managerialism , 1993 .

[59]  R. W. Cole.  THE PUBLIC SECTOR: THE CONFLICT BETWEEN ACCOUNTABILITY AND EFFICIENCY , 1988 .

[60]  D. Pearce,et al.  Economic Values and the Natural World , 1995 .

[61]  Amanda Sinclair,et al.  The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses , 1995 .