Geographical Information Systems–Based Marketing Decisions: Effects of Alternative Visualizations on Decision Quality

Marketing planners often use geographical information systems (GISs) to help identify suitable retail locations, regionally distribute advertising campaigns, and target direct marketing activities. Geographical information systems thematic maps facilitate the visual assessment of map regions. A broad set of alternative symbolizations, such as circles, bars, or shading, can be used to visually represent quantitative geospatial data on such maps. However, there is little knowledge on which kind of symbolization is the most adequate in which problem situation. In a large-scale experimental study, the authors show that the type of symbolization strongly influences decision performance. The findings indicate that graduated circles are appropriate symbolizations for geographical information systems thematic maps, and their successful utilization seems to be virtually independent of personal characteristics, such as spatial ability and map experience. This makes circle symbolizations particularly suitable for effective decision making and cross-functional communication.

[1]  J. Wolfe Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  Understanding Geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of Customer Choice , 2005 .

[3]  Bettina Speckmann,et al.  Algorithmic Aspects of Proportional Symbol Maps , 2009, Algorithmica.

[4]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[5]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action , 2007 .

[6]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The effects of task complexity and time availability limitations on human performance in database query tasks , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  A psychological approach to decision support systems , 1996 .

[8]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[9]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  The Determinants of DSS Success: An Integrated Model* , 1992 .

[10]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Identifying Spatial Segments in International Markets , 2002 .

[11]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentations , 1981 .

[12]  J. Flannery THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME COMMON GRADUATED POINT SYMBOLS IN THE PRESENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA , 1971 .

[13]  T. Hernández,et al.  The art and science of retail location decisions , 2000 .

[14]  Gerrit van Bruggen,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System , 1998 .

[15]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .

[16]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring the Factors Associated with Expert Systems Success , 1995, MIS Q..

[17]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  Beyond Graduated Circles: Varied Point Symbols for Representing Quantitative Data on Maps , 1998 .

[18]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Unobserved Retailer Behavior in Multimarket Data: Joint Spatial Dependence in Market Shares and Promotion Variables , 2001 .

[19]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Using Geographical Information Systems for Decision Making: Extending Cognitive Fit Theory to Map-Based Presentations , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[21]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[22]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  The Role of Complexity and Symbolization Method in Thematic Map Effectiveness , 1982 .

[23]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Marketing decision support systems: Adoption, use, and satisfaction , 1997 .

[24]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[25]  Terry A. Slocum Thematic Cartography and Visualization , 1998 .

[26]  D Zakay,et al.  Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[27]  Frenkel Ter,et al.  Identifying Spatial Segments in International Markets , 2002 .

[28]  Gerrit van Bruggen,et al.  How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  From The Cover: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[32]  William C. Perkins,et al.  Spatial decision support systems: An overview of technology and a test of efficacy , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Prabhakant Sinha,et al.  The 2004 ISMS Practice Prize Winner-Sales Territory Design: Thirty Years of Modeling and Implementation , 2005 .

[34]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  Decision making under time pressure: A model for information systems research , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Erran Carmel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Different Representations for Managerial Problem Solving: Comparing Tables and Maps , 1997 .

[36]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[37]  Judith A. Tyner Introduction to Thematic Cartography , 1992 .

[38]  Dan R. Pieptea,et al.  Price and Value of Decision Support Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[39]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[40]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .

[41]  G. R. P. Lawrence,et al.  CARTOGRAPHIC DESIGN AND PRODUCTION , 1975 .

[42]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  Individual Differences in Map Reading Spatial Abilities Using Perceptual and Memory Processes , 2005 .

[43]  Mario A. Gomarasca,et al.  Elements of Cartography , 2009 .

[44]  Danny Dorling,et al.  Worldmapper: The Human Anatomy of a Small Planet , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[45]  Thomas J. Steenburgh,et al.  Massively Categorical Variables: Revealing the Information in Zip Codes , 2003 .