Personality and its effects on learning performance: Design guidelines for an adaptive e-learning system based on a user model

Abstract An increasingly widespread interest in developing fully adaptable e-learning systems (e.g., intelligent tutoring systems) has led to the development of a wide range of adaptive processes and techniques. In particular, advances in these systems are based on optimization for each user's learning style and characteristics, to enable a personalized learning experience. Current techniques are aimed at using a learner's personality traits and its effect on learning preferences to improve both the initial learning experience and the information retained (e.g., top-down or bottom-up learning organization). This study empirically tested the relationship between a learner's personality traits, analyzed the effects of these traits on learning preferences, and suggested design guidelines for adaptive learning systems. Two controlled experiments were carried out in a computer-based learning session. Our first experiment showed a significant difference in the learning performance of participants who were identified as introverts vs. those who were identified as being extroverts, according to the MBTI scale. As the distinction between extroverted personality types vs. introverted personality types showed the strongest correlation in terms of different learning styles, we used this criteria in our second experiment to determine whether design guidelines for appropriate content organization could reinforce the aforementioned correlation between personality type and learning experience. Relevance to industry : The findings from this article provide how one can practically apply personality traits to the design of e-learning systems. The structure and level of extraversion could be the features to be examined in this regard.

[1]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Proposing a Fuzzy Adaptation Mechanism Based on Cognitive Factors of Users for Web Personalization , 2012, AIAI.

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Autotutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states , 2007 .

[3]  P.M.E. De Bra,et al.  Incorporating cognitive styles in AHA! (the adaptive hypermedia architecture) , 2004 .

[4]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  INSPIRE: An INtelligent System for Personalized Instruction in a Remote Environment , 2001, OHS-7/SC-3/AH-3.

[5]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Jay W. Rojewski,et al.  The Relationship Between Psychological Type and Professional Orientation Among Technology Education Teachers , 1995 .

[7]  Hadj Batatia,et al.  A framework for adapting instruction to cognitive learning styles , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[8]  Linda K. Kirby,et al.  Introduction to Type : A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1980 .

[9]  D. Kolb,et al.  Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions , 2000 .

[10]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-based Instruction , 2001 .

[11]  Clifford Jones,et al.  Catering for different learning styles , 1995 .

[12]  Kinshuk,et al.  The relationship between learning styles and cognitive traits - Getting additional information for improving student modelling , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[14]  Asil Oztekin,et al.  UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for eLearning systems by criticality metric analysis , 2010 .

[15]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  Cognitive style and instructional preferences , 1999 .

[16]  Panagiotis Germanakos,et al.  Capturing essential intrinsic user behaviour values for the design of comprehensive web-based personalized environments , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Zhenhui Rao Bridging the Gap Between Teaching and Learning Styles in East Asian Contexts , 2002 .

[18]  Samuel Messick,et al.  THE CRITERION PROBLEM IN THE EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION: ASSESSING POSSIBLE, NOT JUST INTENDED OUTCOMES1 , 1969 .

[19]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[20]  B. K. Blaylock,et al.  COGNITIVE STYLE AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION , 1984 .

[21]  Eunjoo Oh,et al.  Cross Relationships between Cognitive Styles and Learner Variables in Online Learning Environment. , 2005 .

[22]  G. Lawrence,et al.  Looking at Type and Learning Styles , 1997 .

[23]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[24]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[25]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Adapting instruction in search of 'a significant difference' , 1999, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Li-fang Zhang,et al.  Does Student–Teacher Thinking Style Match/Mismatch Matter in Students’ Achievement? , 2006 .

[28]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study , 2000 .

[29]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  R. Felder,et al.  The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes , 2002 .

[31]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  A tool for developing adaptive electronic textbooks on WWW , 1996, WebNet.

[32]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[33]  Alexandra I. Cristea,et al.  Patterns in Authoring of Adaptive Educational Hypermedia: A Taxonomy of Learning Styles , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  Glenn Stewart MBTI Distributions for First Year IT Students , 2006 .

[35]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  Participation in online interaction spaces: Design-use mediation in an Open Source Software community , 2009 .

[36]  C. Sidney Burrus Connexions: An open educational resource for the 21st century , 2007 .

[37]  Yu-chu Yeh,et al.  Development of design criteria and evaluation scale for web-based learning platforms , 2009 .

[38]  Charles R. Phillips,et al.  "Assessing Pharmacy Students' Learning Styles and Personality Types: A Ten-Year Analysis " , 1999 .

[39]  Bobbie Sue Whitworth,et al.  Is there a relationship between personality type and preferred conflict-handling styles? An exploratory study of registered nurses in southern Mississippi. , 2008, Journal of nursing management.

[40]  Curtis A. Carver,et al.  Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles , 1999 .

[41]  Natalia Stash,et al.  Authoring of learning styles in adaptive hypermedia: problems and solutions , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[42]  Annette Vincent,et al.  Personalize training: determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences online , 2001 .

[43]  Simon Thompson,et al.  Haskell: The Craft of Functional Programming , 1996 .