Model‐based control of neuromuscular block using mivacurium: design and clinical verification

Background: Short‐acting agents for neuromuscular block (NMB) require frequent dosing adjustments for individual patient's needs. In this study, we verified a new closed‐loop controller for mivacurium dosing in clinical trials. Methods: Fifteen patients were studied. T1% measured with electromyography was used as input signal for the model‐based controller. After induction of propofol/opiate anaesthesia, stabilization of baseline electromyography signal was awaited and a bolus of 0.3 mg kg−1 mivacurium was then administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Closed‐loop infusion was started thereafter, targeting a neuromuscular block of 90%. Setpoint deviation, the number of manual interventions and surgeon's complaints were recorded. Drug use and its variability between and within patients were evaluated. Results: Median time of closed‐loop control for the 11 patients included in the data processing was 135 [89–336] min (median [range]). Four patients had to be excluded because of sensor problems. Mean absolute deviation from setpoint was 1.8 ± 0.9 T1%. Neither manual interventions nor complaints from the surgeons were recorded. Mean necessary mivacurium infusion rate was 7.0 ± 2.2 μg kg−1 min−1. Intrapatient variability of mean infusion rates over 30‐min interval showed high differences up to a factor of 1.8 between highest and lowest requirement in the same patient. Conclusions: Neuromuscular block can precisely be controlled with mivacurium using our model‐based controller. The amount of mivacurium needed to maintain T1% at defined constant levels differed largely between and within patients. Closed‐loop control seems therefore advantageous to automatically maintain neuromuscular block at constant levels.

[1]  K. Nitahara,et al.  [Neuromuscular monitoring]. , 2008, Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology.

[2]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mivacurium in young adult and elderly patients , 2002, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  H Schwilden,et al.  Adaptive closed-loop feedback control of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular relaxation. , 1991, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[4]  J. Viby-Mogensen Postoperative residual curarization and evidence-based anaesthesia. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  J. Caldwell New Skeletal Muscle Relaxants , 1995, International anesthesiology clinics.

[6]  F. Donati,et al.  Mivacurium arteriovenous gradient during steady state infusion in anesthetized patients. , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[7]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Impact of Anesthesia Management Characteristics on Severe Morbidity and Mortality , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[8]  D. R. Cook,et al.  Mivacurium infusion during nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia: a comparison with nitrous oxide-opioid anesthesia. , 1992, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[9]  J. Severinghaus,et al.  Effect of a Vecuronium‐induced Partial Neuromuscular Block on Hypoxic Ventilatory Response , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[10]  T. Sharpe,et al.  Neuromuscular and haemodynamic effects of mivacurium in elderly and young adult patients. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  Steven L. Shafer,et al.  Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps , 1992, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[12]  H. H. Ali,et al.  The Clinical Neuromuscular Pharmacology of Mivacurium Chloride (BW B1090U). A Short‐acting Nondepolarizing Ester Neuromuscular Blocking Drug , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[13]  D. R. Cook,et al.  Comparison of mivacurium and suxamethonium administered by bolus and infusion. , 1989, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents , 1996, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  K. Olkkola,et al.  Performance assessment of an adaptive model-based feedback controller: Comparison between atracurium, mivacurium, rocuronium and vecuronium , 1996, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[16]  D. Mokart,et al.  Mivacurium en administration continue pour des actes courts. Délais d'installation et de régression du bloc neuromusculaire , 1995 .

[17]  K. Olkkola,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of mivacurium in children, using a computer-controlled infusion. , 1993, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Pharmacokinetic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents: Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) , 2000, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  G. Rolly,et al.  The influence of isoflurane on a continuous infusion of mivacurium , 1995, Anaesthesia.

[20]  J. Blache,et al.  [Continuous administration of mivacurium for short procedures. Delayed onset and recovery from neuromuscular blockade]. , 1995, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[21]  A. Glattfelder,et al.  Modelling and closed-loop control of skeletal muscle relaxation during general anaesthesia using mivacurium , 2003, 2003 European Control Conference (ECC).

[22]  C. Lien,et al.  The Phamtacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Stereoisomers of Mivacurium in Patients Receiving Nitrous Oxide/Opioid/Barbiturate Anesthesia , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[23]  H Schwilden,et al.  Model‐based adaptive closed‐loop feedback control of atracurium‐induced neuromuscular blockade , 1991, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[24]  Pharmacokinetics of mivacurium in normal patients and in those with hepatic or renal failure. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.