Impact of target probability on single-trial EEG target detection in a difficult rapid serial visual presentation task

In non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI), the analysis of event-related potentials (ERP) has typically focused on averaged trials, a current trend is to analyze single-trial evoked response individually with new approaches in pattern recognition and signal processing. Such single trial detection requires a robust response that can be detected in a variety task conditions. Here, we investigated the influence of target probability, a key factor known to influence the amplitude of the evoked response, on single trial target classification in a difficult rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. Our classification approach for detecting target vs. non target responses, considers spatial filters obtained through the maximization of the signal to signal-plus-noise ratio, and then uses the resulting information as inputs to a Bayesian discriminant analysis. The method is evaluated across eight healthy subjects, on four probability conditions (P=0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50). We show that the target probability has a statistically significant effect on both the behavioral performance and the target detection. The best mean area under the ROC curve is achieved with P=0.10, AUC=0.82. These results suggest that optimal performance of ERP detection in RSVP tasks is critically dependent on target probability.

[1]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[3]  Jose M. Leiva,et al.  MLSP Competition, 2010: Description of first place method , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing.

[4]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[5]  N. Bigdely-Shamlo,et al.  Brain Activity-Based Image Classification From Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  O Bertrand,et al.  A robust sensor-selection method for P300 brain–computer interfaces , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  J. Touryan,et al.  Real-Time Measurement of Face Recognition in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  P. Sajda,et al.  Spatiotemporal Linear Decoding of Brain State , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  The sixth annual MLSP competition, 2010 , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing.

[10]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  xDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  L. Parra,et al.  Ieee Signal Processing Magazine, Accepted for Publication, August 2007 Spatio-temporal Linear Decoding of Brain State: Application to Performance Augmentation in High-throughput Tasks , 2022 .

[15]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  fMRI Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  P. Sajda,et al.  Cortically coupled computer vision for rapid image search , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.