Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application

Abstract The experience of landscape has, through the development of the European Landscape Convention, been highlighted as an important aspect to be incorporated in the management and planning of future landscapes. Complexity is a concept that appears in the development of indicators for several landscape functions, including visual quality and biodiversity. In environmental psychology, complexity has been used as an explanatory factor for landscape preference. This paper outlines the factors which constitute the dimensions of complexity perception and how these relate to coherence—a factor which seems to interact with complexity as regards to landscape experience. The paper further explores how indicators of landscape complexity developed within the framework of landscape ecology may be applied and used to capture relevant information on visually experienced landscape complexity. Particular attention is paid to the dimensional transitions which must be considered in order for map based indicators and perceived environmental qualities to be readily related in an applied setting. The paper concludes with some suggested models for how to link landscape indicators with landscape preference in future research.

[1]  Terry Purcell,et al.  Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference , 2004 .

[2]  J. Reynolds,et al.  A Simulation Experiment to Quantify Spatial Heterogeneity in Categorical Maps , 1994 .

[3]  J. Westphal,et al.  The Psychological Utility of Visual Penetration in near-view Forest Scenic-Beauty Models , 1989 .

[4]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[5]  J. Lucio,et al.  Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes , 2006 .

[6]  H. Décamps,et al.  Landscape ecology in theory and practice , 2003 .

[7]  Eli Dresner,et al.  The Topology of Auditory and Visual Perception, Linguistic Communication, and Interactive Written Discourse , 2005 .

[8]  Victoria Pepper,et al.  The design of forest landscapes. , 2003 .

[9]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[10]  Gary Fry,et al.  Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory , 2008 .

[11]  A. Nagurney.  Congested urban transportation networks and emission paradoxes , 2000 .

[12]  Werner Nohl,et al.  Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception–preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics , 2001 .

[13]  David Miller,et al.  Landscape Metrics and Visual Topology in the Analysis of Landscape Preference , 2008 .

[14]  R. J. Lamb,et al.  Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach , 1998 .

[15]  D. Bailey,et al.  Thematic resolution matters: Indicators of landscape pattern for European agro-ecosystems , 2007 .

[16]  O Mason,et al.  Graph theory and networks in Biology. , 2006, IET systems biology.

[17]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  C. Darwin.  Journal of researches into the geology and natural history of the various countries visited by H. M. S. Beagle, under the command of Captain Fitzroy, R. N. from 1832 to 1836 , 1839 .

[19]  T. Daniel.  Measuring the quality of the natural environment: A psychophysical approach. , 1990 .

[20]  Hong S. He,et al.  Effects of spatial aggregation approaches on classified satellite imagery , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Scale and topology in the ecological economics sustainability paradigm , 2002 .

[22]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Sampling to characterize landscape pattern , 1994, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  M. Velardea,et al.  Health effects of viewing landscapes – Landscape types in environmental psychology , 2007 .

[24]  Vassilios A. Tsihrintzis,et al.  South Florida greenways: a conceptual framework for the ecological reconnectivity of the region , 1995 .

[25]  Arthur E Stamps,et al.  Advances in Visual Diversity and Entropy , 2003 .

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[27]  L. Kinsey.  Topology of surfaces , 1993 .

[28]  R.P. Taylor,et al.  Reduction of Physiological Stress Using Fractal Art and Architecture , 2006, Leonardo.

[29]  C. Darwin.  Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries Visited by H. M. S. Beagle: ADDENDA , 2009 .

[30]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Extending the applicability of viewsheds in landscape planning , 1996 .

[31]  Wendy Fjellstad,et al.  Integrating landscape-based values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes , 2001 .

[32]  L G Firbank,et al.  Changing landscapes, habitats and vegetation diversity across Great Britain. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  M. Germino,et al.  Estimating visual properties of Rocky Mountain landscapes using GIS , 2001 .

[34]  J. Lankhorst,et al.  Evaluating visible spatial diversity in the landscape , 1998 .

[35]  R. Holdaway.  New Zealand's pre-human avifauna and its vulnerability , 1989 .

[36]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Reflections on spatial autocorrelation , 2007 .

[37]  W. Davis.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 2012 .

[38]  J. Palmer.  Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts , 2004 .

[39]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[40]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[41]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  G. Fry,et al.  Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure , 2006 .

[43]  A. Stamps.  Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis , 2004 .

[44]  H Hecht,et al.  Perceiving topological structure of 2-D patterns. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[45]  A. Lausch.  Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability , 2002 .

[46]  D. Pearson.  The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelation for describing pattern in north Australian landscapes. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  G. Fry,et al.  The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators , 2009 .

[48]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Patternandscale: statistics for landscape ecology , 1991 .

[49]  R. M. Hulshoff.  Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[50]  M. Egenhofer.  Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases , 1998 .

[51]  Claude Grasland,et al.  Modifiable Area Unit Problem , 2006 .

[52]  Stefan Klotz,et al.  Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years , 2006 .

[53]  Åsa Ode,et al.  Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character , 2006 .

[54]  Constantino Arce,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPES USING QUANTITATIVE AND CATEGORICAL DATA, AND PREDICTION OF THEIR SCENIC BEAUTY IN NORTH-WESTERN SPAIN , 2000 .

[55]  Oliver W. R. Lucas,et al.  The Design of Forest Landscapes , 1991 .

[56]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[57]  David Salesin,et al.  Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer.1 , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[58]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Corridors for Conservation: Integrating Pattern and Process , 2006 .

[59]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Assessment of Visual Qualities, Impacts, and Behaviours, in the Landscape, by Using Measures of Visibility , 2003 .

[60]  Veerle Van Eetvelde,et al.  Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics , 2000 .

[61]  F. Kienast,et al.  Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty – a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[62]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Wavelets in computer graphics , 1996, Proc. IEEE.

[63]  Thorbjörn Laike,et al.  Investigations of Human EEG Response to Viewing Fractal Patterns , 2008, Perception.

[64]  H. Day.  Evaluations of subjective complexity, pleasingness and interestingness for a series of random polygons varying in complexity , 1967 .

[65]  D. Berlyne.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[66]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Universal aesthetic of fractals , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[67]  R. Ulrich.  Natural Versus Urban Scenes , 1981 .

[68]  J. A. Wise,et al.  Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns. , 2005, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[69]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[70]  Alexis J. Comber,et al.  Land use or land cover? , 2008 .