Impact of Media Coverage and Motivation on Political Information Reconciling Passive and Motivated Learning : The Saturation-Conditional

Representative democracy requires that citizens express informed political opinions, and in order to inform their opinions, they must have the opportunity to acquire relevant facts from the media. In view of increasing audience segmentation, such opportunity may vary according to how widely political information diffuses across the various sources available in a media environment. However, it remains uncertain how differences in information saturation correspond with differences in information acquisition. Drawing on data from a rolling cross-sectional survey with nearly 60 waves and media content analyses spanning four European countries, this article examines whether a wider availability of information in collective media environments facilitates acquisition of such information. It also specifies the conditions under which this effect differs for people with different levels of learning motivation. Using a multilevel model, we find the media environment to be a remarkably powerful force in equipping people with political information. We also find that better-motivated citizens initially benefit disproportionately from the availability of information, yet motivation-based discrepancies in learning disappear entirely when media coverage becomes more prevalent.

[1]  Cliff Zukin,et al.  Passive Learning: When the Media Environment Is the Message , 1984 .

[2]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[3]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  Mass Media and the Knowledge Gap , 1975 .

[4]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Education, Need for Cognition, and Campaign Interest as Moderators of News Effects on Political Knowledge: An Analysis of the Knowledge Gap , 2005 .

[5]  Gary King,et al.  The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals , 2006, Political Analysis.

[6]  S. Banducci,et al.  Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: the 2009 European Parliamentary elections , 2011 .

[7]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[8]  S. Iyengar “ Dark Areas of Ignorance ” Revisited Comparing International Affairs Knowledge in Switzerland and the United States , 2009 .

[9]  J. Krosnick,et al.  National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality , 2009 .

[10]  R. Rich,et al.  Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation , 2000 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[13]  David W. Moore POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS AND THE KNOWLEDGE-GAP HYPOTHESIS , 1987 .

[14]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  The Impact of Media Coverage and Motivation on Performance-Relevant Information , 2013 .

[15]  B. Highton Revisiting the Relationship between Educational Attainment and Political Sophistication , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[16]  J. Finnegan,et al.  The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis: Twenty-Five Years Later , 1996 .

[17]  Robert C. Luskin Explaining political sophistication , 1990 .

[18]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Revisiting the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis , 1999 .

[19]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government , 1994 .

[20]  A.M.J. Derks Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections , 2009 .

[21]  William L. Rosenberg Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[22]  W. Bennett,et al.  The Burglar Alarm That Just Keeps Ringing: A Response to Zaller , 2003 .

[23]  Jeffery J. Mondak Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge , 1999, Political Analysis.

[24]  J. P. Eveland The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[25]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[26]  Jennifer Jerit,et al.  Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy‐Specific Knowledge , 2009 .

[27]  J. Zaller The statistical power of election studies to detect media exposure effects in political campaigns , 2002 .

[28]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters , 2005 .

[29]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[30]  J. Wall Effects of sex and opposing representative's bargaining orientation on intergroup bargaining. , 1976 .

[31]  M. Baum Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[33]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Understanding the Relationship Between Communication and Political Knowledge: A Model Comparison Approach Using Panel Data , 2005 .

[34]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Forecast 2000: Widening Knowledge Gaps , 1997 .

[35]  P. Mancini,et al.  Comparing Media Systems: Conclusion , 2004 .

[36]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata , 2005 .

[37]  K. Krippendorff Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[38]  B. K. L. Genova,et al.  Interests in News and the Knowledge Gap , 1979 .

[39]  Jennifer Jerit,et al.  Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment , 2006 .

[40]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[41]  Matthew Levendusky Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowlege , 2003 .

[42]  M. Kretschmer Political knowledge: A comparative perspective , 2001 .

[43]  M. Prior,et al.  You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle , 2010 .

[44]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[45]  J. Zaller,et al.  WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .

[46]  M. Slater Operationalizing and Analyzing Exposure: The Foundation of Media Effects Research , 2004 .

[47]  J. Zaller A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen , 2003 .

[48]  M. Prior,et al.  News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout , 2005 .

[49]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  The rolling cross-section design , 2002 .

[50]  Svitlana Chernykh,et al.  Assumed Transmission in Political Science: A Call for Bringing Description Back In , 2011 .

[51]  Neil Malhotra,et al.  Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys , 2008 .

[52]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Cross‐National versus Individual‐Level Differences in Political Information: A Media Systems Perspective , 2010 .

[53]  R. Rich,et al.  The Political Environment and Citizen Competence , 2001 .

[54]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[55]  Jennifer Jerit,et al.  Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid? , 2010, American Political Science Review.