The Urban Regeneration Industry in Leeds: Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance

The aim of this project is to investigate the level of sustainability being achieved by urban regeneration projects in the UK with specific focus on the urban regeneration in the East Bank area of Leeds. The study investigates the definitions of sustainability being applied to British urban policy and finds projects are incorporating it with varying degrees of success. It reviews current research into methods of measuring sustainability and sustainable urban regeneration performance and finds indicator based approaches are the most widely used and most effective. An indicator based methodology developed by Lesley Hemphill, Jim Berry and Stanley McGreal of the Centre for Research on Property and Planning at the University of Ulster is applied to the East Bank regeneration area of Leeds to measure sustainable urban regeneration performance. The performance of the East Bank is subsequently compared to the case studies used by Hemphill, Berry and McGreal. The Hemphill framework was found to effectively assess the sustainability performance of regeneration projects, though it had a number of weaknesses. The framework is discussed as a useful policy tool and a basis for developing a national indicator framework for urban regeneration projects.

[1]  Chris Couch,et al.  Urban regeneration in Europe , 2003 .

[2]  A. Hastings,et al.  Unravelling the Process of 'Partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy , 1996 .

[3]  Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.  FORUM: Dematerialization, MIPS and Factor 10 Physical sustainability indicators as a social device , 1999 .

[4]  Michael S. Gibson,et al.  An introduction to urban renewal , 1982 .

[5]  Lesley Hemphill,et al.  An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 1, Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Framework , 2004 .

[6]  D. Satterthwaite The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Cities , 1999 .

[7]  Roderic A. Gill,et al.  Planning for sustainability as a learning concept , 1998 .

[8]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The institutional challenge for sustainable urban regeneration , 1995 .

[9]  Dan Rigby,et al.  A review of indicators of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability , 2000 .

[10]  Lesley Hemphill,et al.  An Indicator-based Approach to Measuring Sustainable Urban Regeneration Performance: Part 2, Empirical Evaluation and Case-study Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 , 2001 .

[12]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Institutions and indicators – The discourse about indicators in the context of sustainability , 2004 .

[13]  Jeb Brugmann,et al.  Is there a method in our measurement? The use of indicators in local sustainable development planning , 1997 .

[14]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Quality of Life Perceptions and Directions for Urban Regeneration in Hong Kong , 2005 .

[15]  Chris Couch,et al.  Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain , 2000 .

[16]  M. Charter Sustainable Solutions : Developing Products and Services for the Future , 2001 .

[17]  Gordon Mitchell,et al.  PROBLEMS AND FUNDAMENTALS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS , 1996 .

[18]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience , 1998 .