Multiproject strategy, design transfer, and project performance: a survey of automobile development projects in the US and Japan

Large manufacturers usually need to manage multiple projects in order to leverage their financial and engineering resource investments on new technologies and designs. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between different multiproject strategies and project performance measured by lead time and engineering hours. The multiproject strategy in this study focuses on different ways of transferring core technologies and designs from one project to another within the firm. First, this paper proposes a typology of different multiproject strategies, which categorizes new product development projects into four types: new design, rapid design transfer, sequential design transfer, and design modification. Second, using survey results on 103 different new product projects at 10 automobile firms in Japan and the US, this study concludes that projects using the rapid design transfer strategy are the most efficient in terms of engineering hours. Only through rapid design transfer can a preceding design be transferred from a base project to a new project with effective task sharing among engineers and mutual adjustments between the two projects. This paper also discusses organizational requirements for managing rapid design transfer projects. Neither a pure project-team approach nor a functional approach seem appropriate for the management of concurrent multiple projects.

[1]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[2]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Uneasy alliance: Managing the productivity-technology dilemma , 1985 .

[3]  D. Teece.  ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[4]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  Managing the Product Line: A Case of the Automobile Industry , 1992 .

[5]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Japan's Software Factories: A Challenge to U.S. Management, Michael A. Cusumano. 1991. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 513 pages. ISBN: 0-19-506216-7 , 1991, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[6]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[7]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[8]  R. Cordero.  Managing for speed to avoid product obsolescence: A survey of techniques , 1991 .

[9]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[10]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[11]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Multi-project management: strategy and organization in automobile product development , 1993 .

[12]  J. Beckham.  New product development. , 1985, Hospital forum.

[13]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment , 1995 .

[14]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[15]  C. Crawford.  The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[16]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[17]  W. Sasser,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[19]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[20]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Managing the new product development process , 1985 .

[21]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U. S. auto plants , 1991 .

[22]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[23]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[24]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[25]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[26]  Ralph E. Gomory.  Moving IBM's Technology from Research to Development , 1989 .

[27]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[28]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[29]  Bela Gold,et al.  Approaches to accelerating product and process development , 1987 .

[30]  Donald Streeter,et al.  The Transfer of Technology from Research to Development , 1979 .

[31]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[32]  Geoff Vincent,et al.  —Managing— New-Product Development , 1989, Springer US.

[33]  Eric von. Hippel,et al.  The impact of "sticky" information on innovation and problem-solving , 1990 .