Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift

Chi (1992, 1993) Chi et al. (1994) suggests that many of the difficulties encountered by students in learning Physics concepts arise because they attribute the ontology of material substances to these concepts. These concepts are actually a special type of process - 'Constraint-Based Interactions' (CBI). Slotta and Chi (1996) reported on a study where a group of students explicitly trained in the CBI ontology showed significant gains over a control group in problem solving performance in eight simple electric circuit problems. This paper reports on a series of four studies which explore the usefulness of the ontological categorization framework in investigating students' alternative conceptions of electric circuits and in developing a teaching strategy for promoting conceptual change in the learning of basic electric circuitry concepts.

[1]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The importance of analogy: A prelude to the special issue , 1993 .

[2]  David Eric Brown.  Using analogies and examples to help students overcome misconceptions in physics: A comparison of two teaching strategies , 1987 .

[3]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[4]  M. Chi,et al.  Assessing Students' Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change , 1995 .

[5]  David Shipstone,et al.  A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits , 1984 .

[6]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[7]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[8]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Barriers to Conceptual Change in Learning Science Concepts: A Theoretical Conjecture , 1993 .

[9]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Children's science and its consequences for teaching , 1982 .

[10]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Creating Cognitive Dissonance Between Students' Preconceptions To Encourage Individual Cognitive Accommodation and a Group Cooperative Construction of a Scientific Model. , 1981 .

[11]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[12]  H Helm,et al.  Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students , 1980 .

[13]  E. Wong,et al.  Self‐generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena , 1993 .

[14]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity , 1991 .

[15]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[16]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. 2nd Edition. , 1988 .

[17]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. Bibliography. 3rd Edition. IPN Reports-in-Brief = Alltagsvorstellungen und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht. Bibliographie. 3. Auflage. IPN-Kurzberichte. , 1991 .

[18]  Amos Dreyfus,et al.  Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change - some implications, difficulties, and problems , 1990 .

[19]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  Effecting Changes in Cognitive Structures Amongst Physics Students. , 1983 .

[20]  John J. Clement,et al.  Overcoming students' misconceptions in physics: the rold of anchoring institutions and analogical validity , 1987 .

[21]  M. Cosgrove,et al.  A study of science‐in‐the‐making as students generate an analogy for electricity , 1995 .

[22]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[23]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Understanding constraint-based processes: A precursor to conceptual change in physics , 1996 .